Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35402006›Full record

ArticleOman medical journal2022

Ultra-minimally Invasive Sonographically-guided Trigger Digit Release: An External Pilot Study.

Guillermo Rodríguez-Maruri, Jose Manuel Rojo-Manaute, Alberto Capa-Grasa, Francisco Chana Rodríguez, Miguel Del Cerro Gutierrez, Javier Vaquero Martín

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oman medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided A1 pulley release utilizing a modified 20-gauge spinal needle.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2025
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guillermo Rodríguez-MaruriDepartment Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Jose Manuel Rojo-ManauteUnit of Hand Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Medcare Orthopaedics and Spine Hospital, Dubai, UAE.
Alberto Capa-GrasaDepartment Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Chana RodríguezDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Del Cerro GutierrezHand Surgery Unit, Beata Maria Ana Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Javier Vaquero MartínDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The most common surgical option for releasing the first annular pulley in trigger digit (TD) is classic open surgery followed by blind percutaneous release. However, they have been related to major complications and incomplete releases, respectively. Intrasheath sonographically-guided first annular pulley release has recently been shown to be safe and effective in every digit. The objectives of this pilot study were to preliminary compare clinically an intrasheath sonographically-guided first annular pulley release versus a classic open technique and to evaluate the feasibility of a future clinical trial in patients with TDs. Methods: Thirty patients were randomized 1:1 in an external pilot study comparing the two surgical techniques: a percutaneous sonographically-guided release performed through a 1 mm incision using a hook knife versus a classic open surgery with a 1 cm incision. Inclusion criteria were primary TD grade III (Froimson). We defined success if primary (safety and efficacy) and secondary (recruitment rates, compliance, completion, treatment blinding, personnel resources, and sample size calculation for the clinical trial) objectives could be matched. We registered the grip strength, the QuickDASH score and a set of postoperative clinical variables at one, three, and six weeks and at three months. We calculated the sample size for the clinical trial using the QuickDASH at the end of the follow-up. Outcomes assessors were blinded. Results: All patients in both groups showed resolution of their symptoms with no associated complications or relapses. Secondary feasibility objectives were matched: 76.9% of eligible patients were included in the study, 3.3% refused randomization, 20 patients per month were recruited, 100% received blinded treatment, 98.5% showed compliance, and 100% completed the study. The sample size for a future clinical trial was 84 patients. There were no differences in grip strength. The intrasheath sonographically-guided first annular pulley release showed significantly better QuickDASH scores, until the sixth postoperative week. Conclusions: The intrasheath sonographically-guided first annular pulley release is safe and efficacious, and shows a trend toward clinical superiority versus the classic open procedure, which should be confirmed with a clinical trial. Our study shows that a randomized clinical trial is feasible.

Indexed as

SurgeryTrigger Finger DisorderUltrasonography, Interventional

Identifiers

PMID35402006
PMCPMC8976884
OpenAlexW3205659609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.