Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35401870›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2022

Modeling plasticity during epileptogenesis by long short term memory neural networks.

Marzieh Shahpari, Morteza Hajji, Javad Mirnajafi-Zadeh, Peyman Setoodeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Machine-learning methods for epilepsy diagnosis and therapeutic prevention: advances, setbacks, and opportunities.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marzieh ShahpariEpilepsy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Morteza HajjiSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Javad Mirnajafi-ZadehDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Peyman SetoodehSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-5618-9717

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the pathogenesis of epilepsy including changes in synaptic pathways can improve our knowledge about epilepsy and development of new treatments. In this regard, data-driven models such as artificial neural networks, which are able to capture the effects of synaptic plasticity, can play an important role. This paper proposes long short term memory (LSTM) as the ideal architecture for modeling plasticity changes, and validates this proposal via experimental data. As a special class of recurrent neural networks (RNNs), LSTM is able to track information through time and control its flow via several gating mechanisms, which allow for maintaining the relevant and forgetting the irrelevant information. In our experiments, potentiation and depotentiation of motor circuit and perforant pathway as two forms of plasticity were respectively induced by kindled and kindled + transcranial magnetic stimulation of animal groups. In kindling, both procedure duration and gradual synaptic changes play critical roles. The stimulation of both groups continued for six days. Both after-discharge (AD) and seizure behavior as two biologically measurable effects of plasticity were recorded immediately post each stimulation. Three classes of artificial neural networks-LSTM, RNN, and feedforward neural network (FFNN)-were trained to predict AD and seizure behavior as indicators of plasticity during these six days. Results obtained from the collected data confirm the superiority of LSTM. For seizure behavior, the prediction accuracies achieved by these three models were 0.91 ± 0.01, 0.77 ± 0.02, and 0.59 ± 0.02%, respectively, and for AD, the prediction accuracies were 0.82 ± 0.01, 0.74 ± 0.08 and 0.42 ± 0.1, respectively.

Indexed as

Deep learningEpilepsy modelKindlingLSTM

Identifiers

PMID35401870
PMCPMC8934824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.