ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2022
Chemotherapy regimen choice and patient outcomes in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of early multidisciplinary team interventions on dietary management behavior in breast cancer patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial.BMC cancer · 2025Trial
- Bibliometric insights into the advancements and future directions of hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- A Real-World Evaluation of Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Cancer Treatments and Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapies in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Article
- Dietary Behavior and Its Association with Nutrition Literacy and Dietary Attitude Among Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Survey of Hospitals in China.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with a poor prognosis when compared to hormone receptor-positive breast cancers. Anthracycline-based regimens (ABRs) are mainstay for treatment of non-metastatic TNBC. However, anthracyclines are associated with an increased risk of potentially life-threatening adverse effects. We sought to evaluate outcomes in patients with early TNBC treated with ABRs Methods: All patients treated for stage I-III TNBC who had undergone curative-intent surgery at a large academic medical center between January 2013 and May 2018 were included in this retrospective study. Event-free survival (EFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were the primary endpoints, with overall survival (OS) as a secondary endpoint and were defined as per standardized STEEP criteria. Kaplan-Meier, multivariable Cox regression, and log-rank tests were used to define key survival and treatment-related differences between subjects treated with ABRs Results: One hundred thirty-two patients met inclusion criteria with a median follow-up of 55.9 months. Twenty-seven patients (20%) had disease recurrence and 20 (15%) died. Patients in the ABR group were more likely to have nodal involvement (chi-square Conclusion: ABRs were associated with shorter EFS, DFS, and OS, even after adjusting for certain high-risk clinical features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.