ReviewCanadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD2022
A review of the effects of oral health media hype on clients' perception of treatment.
Review in Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07550153 (Legal Considerations on Dental Communication Via Social Media), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Legal Considerations on Dental Communication Via Social Media: Liability, Ethics, and Regulatory Evolution
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Association Between Parents' Self-Perceived Oral Health Knowledge and the Presence of Dental Caries in Their Children.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Navigating Child Oral Health in Western Australia: A Caregiver's Perspective.Child: care, health and development · 2025Article
- Social Media Use and Oral Health-Related Misconceptions in Saudi Arabia: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Oral Health Misinformation on Youtube - A Content Analysis.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Social media impact on students' decision-making regarding aesthetic dental treatments based on cross-sectional survey data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- User Insights into Fake Snap-on Veneers: Perceptions and Experiences.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Research shows that approximately 75% of people worldwide access the internet for health information. Lower calibre websites often use inaccurate claims to attract internet browsers. The objective of this review is to alert oral health care professionals (OHCPs) to the impact of oral health media hype on client perceptions of oral care. It also aims to provide OHCPs with tools to educate clients on how to identify credible oral health information online so that they can make informed oral health treatment decisions. Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar. The returns were screened using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 12 (92%) identified that clients browse the internet to research oral health conditions and treatments. Eleven studies (85%) concluded that media outlets influence client perceptions of oral health care and treatment. All 13 studies (100%) found that OHCPs and organizations should better guide clients with tools to discern between evidence-based (EB) and non-evidence-based (NEB) online health information. Discussion: According to the literature, viewing NEB oral health information on the internet affects clients' perceptions of oral health care, which may lead to potentially harmful treatment decisions. Chairside education is effective in reducing the impact of oral health misinformation. Conclusion: OHCPs have the responsibility to address the impact of media hype on clients' perception of oral health care and to direct them to credible health information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35401762PMC8937571What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.