ArticleJournal of oncology2022
Identification of Prognostic Markers of N6-Methylandenosine-Related Noncoding RNAs in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in Journal of oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- M6A RNA modification: focusing on non-small cell lung cancer progression, therapeutic strategies and challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Construction and validation of a prognosis signature based on the immune microenvironment in gastric cancer.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- The development and validation of a m6A-lncRNAs based prognostic model for overall survival in lung squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major type of lung carcinoma that threatens the health and life of humans worldwide. We aimed to establish an n6-methyladenosine (m6A)-relevant ncRNA model to effectively evaluate the outcome of patients. Methods: m6A-Related ncRNAs (lncRNA/miRNA) were acquired from the UCSC Xena database. Pearson's correlation analysis among 21 m6A regulatory factors and ncRNAs were implemented to explore m6A-relevant ncRNAs. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) identified hub modules of gene associated with prognosis of NSCLC patients. Univariate Cox regression analysis identified 80 m6A-related ncRNAs. Least absolute shrinkage and selector operation (LASSO) filtered out redundant factors and established a risk score model (m6A-NSCLC) in the TCGA training data set. Validation of prognostic ability was performed using testing data sets from the TCGA database. We also conducted a correlation analysis among the risk score and different clinical traits. Both univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were combined to verify prognostic factors which have independent value, and a nomogram on the basis of m6A-NSCLC risk scores and clinical traits was constructed to assess the prognosis of patients. In addition, we screened differentially expressed genes (DEGs) based on different risk scores and performed enrichment analysis. Finally, 21 m6A regulators were detected to be differentially expressed between two risk groups. Results: An m6A-NSCLC risk model with 18 ncRNAs was constructed. By comparison with low-risk patients, high-risk score patients had poor prognosis. The distribution of risk score in the tumor size and extent ( Conclusion: The m6A-NSCLC could be effectively utilized for evaluation of prognosis of patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.