Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35401628›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in plant science2022

Wood Formation Modeling - A Research Review and Future Perspectives.

Annemarie H Eckes-Shephard, Fredrik Charpentier Ljungqvist, David M Drew, Cyrille B K Rathgeber, Andrew D Friend

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Onset and Seasonal Kinetics of Xylogenesis inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Xylogenesis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Annemarie H Eckes-ShephardDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Fredrik Charpentier LjungqvistDepartment of History, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
David M DrewDepartment of Forest and Wood Science, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Cyrille B K RathgeberUniversité de Lorraine, AgroParisTech, INRAE, SILVA, Nancy, France.
Andrew D FriendDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wood formation has received considerable attention across various research fields as a key process to model. Historical and contemporary models of wood formation from various disciplines have encapsulated hypotheses such as the influence of external (e.g., climatic) or internal (e.g., hormonal) factors on the successive stages of wood cell differentiation. This review covers 17 wood formation models from three different disciplines, the earliest from 1968 and the latest from 2020. The described processes, as well as their external and internal drivers and their level of complexity, are discussed. This work is the first systematic cataloging, characterization, and process-focused review of wood formation models. Remaining open questions concerning wood formation processes are identified, and relate to: (1) the extent of hormonal influence on the final tree ring structure; (2) the mechanism underlying the transition from earlywood to latewood in extratropical regions; and (3) the extent to which carbon plays a role as "active" driver or "passive" substrate for growth. We conclude by arguing that wood formation models remain to be fully exploited, with the potential to contribute to studies concerning individual tree carbon sequestration-storage dynamics and regional to global carbon sequestration dynamics in terrestrial vegetation models.

Indexed as

dendroclimatologyforestrygrowth–climate interactionsterrestrial carbon cycletree growthwood formation modelsxylogenesis

Identifiers

PMID35401628
PMCPMC8984029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.