Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35401583›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

The ER Is a Common Mediator for the Behavior and Interactions of Other Organelles.

Jaideep Mathur, Olivia Friesen Kroeker, Mariann Lobbezoo, Neeta Mathur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Plastid Transient and Stable Interactions with Other Cell Compartments.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Using ER-Targeted Photoconvertible Fluorescent Proteins in Living Plant Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  16. Visualizing the dynamics of plant energy organelles.Biochemical Society transactions · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jaideep MathurLaboratory of Plant Development and Interaction, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Olivia Friesen KroekerLaboratory of Plant Development and Interaction, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Mariann LobbezooLaboratory of Plant Development and Interaction, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Neeta MathurLaboratory of Plant Development and Interaction, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal functioning of a plant cell depends upon the efficient exchange of genetic information, ions, proteins and metabolites between the different organelles. Intuitively, increased proximity between organelles would be expected to play an important role in facilitating exchanges between them. However, it remains to be seen whether under normal, relatively non-stressed conditions organelles maintain close proximity at all. Moreover, does interactivity involve direct and frequent physical contact between the different organelles? Further, many organelles transition between spherical and tubular forms or sporadically produce thin tubular extensions, but it remains unclear whether changes in organelle morphology play a role in increasing their interactivity. Here, using targeted multicolored fluorescent fusion proteins, we report observations on the spatiotemporal relationship between plastids, mitochondria, peroxisomes and the endoplasmic reticulum in living plant cells. Under normal conditions of growth, we observe that the smaller organelles do not establish direct, physical contacts with each other but, irrespective of their individual form they all maintain intimate connectivity with the ER. Proximity between organelles does increase in response to stress through concomitant alterations in ER dynamics. Significantly, even under increased proximity the ER still remains sandwiched between the different organelles. Our observations provide strong live-imaging-based evidence for the ER acting as a common mediator in interactions between other organelles.

Indexed as

chloroplastsERfluorescent proteins (FPs)mitochondriaorganelle extensionsperoxisomes

Identifiers

PMID35401583
PMCPMC8990311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.