ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022
Optimization of Early Antimicrobial Strategies for Lung Transplant Recipients Based on Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Next-generation sequencing in the etiological diagnosis of severe childhood pneumonia.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Optimizing patient outcomes in interstitial lung disease through pre- and post-transplant management strategies.World journal of transplantation · 2025Review
- Impact of cytomegalovirus DNAemia detected by next-generation sequencing on short-term prognosis after lung transplantation.Infectious medicine · 2025Article
- Etiologic characteristics revealed by mNGS-mediated ultra-early and early microbiological identification in airway secretions from lung transplant recipients.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Supplementary Role of Immunological Indicators in the Diagnosis and Prognosis ofInfection and drug resistance · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of perioperative antibiotic options after lung transplantation varies widely around the world, but there is a common trend to limit antibiotic use duration. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has become a hot spot in clinical pathogen detection due to its precise, rapid, and wide detection spectrum of pathogens. Thus, we defined a new antibiotic regimen adjustment strategy in the very early stage (within 7 days) after lung transplantation mainly depending on mNGS reports combined with clinical conditions to reduce the use of antibiotics. To verify the clinical effect of the strategy, we carried out this research. Thirty patients who underwent lung transplantation were finally included, whose information including etiology, antibiotic adjustment, and the effect of our strategy was recorded. Lung transplant recipients in this study were prescribed with initial antibiotic regimen immediately after surgery; their antibiotic regimens were adjusted according to the strategy. According to our study, the entire effectiveness of the strategy was 90.0% (27/30). Besides, a total of 86 samples containing donor lung tissue, recipient lung tissue, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were obtained in this study; they were all sent to mNGS test, while BALF was also sent to pathogen culture. Their results showed that the positive rate of BALF samples was higher (86.67%) than that of donor's lung tissue (20.0%) or recipient's lung tissue (13.33%) by mNGS test, indicating BALF samples are more valuable than other clinical samples from early postoperative period to guide the early adjustment of antibiotics after lung transplantation. It is effective for mNGS combined with traditional methods and clinical situations to optimize antibiotic regimens in lung transplantation recipients within 7 days after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.