Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35401437›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Functional and Phylogenetic Characterization of Bacteria in Bovine Rumen Using Fractionation of Ruminal Fluid.

Ruth Hernández, Maryam Chaib De Mares, Hugo Jimenez, Alejandro Reyes, Alejandro Caro-Quintero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effects of Replacing Whole-Crop Maize Silage withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  15. Effects of residual blackFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparison of ruminal microbiota,Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruth HernándezMax Planck Tandem Group in Computational Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Maryam Chaib De MaresMax Planck Tandem Group in Computational Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Hugo JimenezAnimal Microbiology Laboratory, Agrodiversity Department, Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria - AGROSAVIA, Bogotá, Colombia.
Alejandro ReyesMax Planck Tandem Group in Computational Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Alejandro Caro-QuinteroDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Universidad de Los Andes · COColombian Corporation for Agricultural Research - AGROSAVIA · COUniversidad Nacional de Colombia · COWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cattle productivity depends on our ability to fully understand and manipulate the fermentation process of plant material that occurs in the bovine rumen, which ultimately leads to the improvement of animal health and increased productivity with a reduction in environmental impact. An essential step in this direction is the phylogenetic and functional characterization of the microbial species composing the ruminal microbiota. To address this challenge, we separated a ruminal fluid sample by size and density using a sucrose density gradient. We used the full sample and the smallest fraction (5%), allowing the enrichment of bacteria, to assemble metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). We obtained a total of 16 bacterial genomes, 15 of these enriched in the smallest fraction of the gradient. According to the recently proposed Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) taxonomy, these MAGs belong to Bacteroidota, Firmicutes_A, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Spirochaetota phyla. Fifteen MAGs were novel at the species level and four at the genus level. The functional characterization of these MAGs suggests differences from what is currently known from the genomic potential of well-characterized members from this complex environment. Species of the phyla Bacteroidota and Spirochaetota show the potential for hydrolysis of complex polysaccharides in the plant cell wall and toward the production of B-complex vitamins and protein degradation in the rumen. Conversely, the MAGs belonging to Firmicutes and Alphaproteobacteria showed a reduction in several metabolic pathways; however, they have genes for lactate fermentation and the presence of hydrolases and esterases related to chitin degradation. Our results demonstrate that the separation of the rumen microbial community by size and density reduced the complexity of the ruminal fluid sample and enriched some poorly characterized ruminal bacteria allowing exploration of their genomic potential and their functional role in the rumen ecosystem.

Indexed as

fractionationMAGsnew speciesruminal fluidsmall-sized bacteria

Identifiers

PMID35401437
PMCPMC8992543
OpenAlexW4221110953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.