Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35401424›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Improving Localization Accuracy of Neural Sources by Pre-processing: Demonstration With Infant MEG Data.

Maggie D Clarke, Eric Larson, Erica R Peterson, Daniel R McCloy, Alexis N Bosseler, Samu Taulu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Perspective: An outlook on fluorescence tracking.The Journal of chemical physics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maggie D ClarkeInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Eric LarsonInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Erica R PetersonInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Daniel R McCloyInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Alexis N BosselerInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Samu TauluInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We discuss specific challenges and solutions in infant MEG, which is one of the most technically challenging areas of MEG studies. Our results can be generalized to a variety of challenging scenarios for MEG data acquisition, including clinical settings. We cover a wide range of steps in pre-processing, including movement compensation, suppression of magnetic interference from sources inside and outside the magnetically shielded room, suppression of specific physiological artifact components such as cardiac artifacts. In the assessment of the outcome of the pre-processing algorithms, we focus on comparing signal representation before and after pre-processing and discuss the importance of the different components of the main processing steps. We discuss the importance of taking the noise covariance structure into account in inverse modeling and present the proper treatment of the noise covariance matrix to accurately reflect the processing that was applied to the data. Using example cases, we investigate the level of source localization error before and after processing. One of our main findings is that statistical metrics of source reconstruction may erroneously indicate that the results are reliable even in cases where the data are severely distorted by head movements. As a consequence, we stress the importance of proper signal processing in infant MEG.

Indexed as

artifactbraininfantmagnetoencephalography (MEG)movement compensationsignal processingsignal space projectionsignal space separation

Identifiers

PMID35401424
PMCPMC8983818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.