Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35401410›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2022

Application of the Neuroform Atlas Stent in Intracranial Aneurysms: Current Status.

Kun Hou, Jinlu Yu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kun HouDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jinlu YuDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
First Hospital of Jilin University · CNJilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Neuroform Atlas stent (NAS) is the successor of the Neuroform EZ stent. The NAS is compatible with a low-profile 0.0165-inch microcatheter and is soft enough to pass through small and highly tortuous vessels. The NAS can be used in treating intracranial aneurysms at almost all locations, and its use is becoming increasingly common. However, there has not yet been a complete review of NAS applications. Therefore, we performed this review, which addresses several aspects of the NAS, mainly including its characteristics, clinical trials of its application in treating aneurysms, deployment techniques for the device, the prognosis and complications of its application in treating aneurysms, and antiplatelet requirements associated with its use. Based on the evidence reviewed here, as well as our experience, we found that the NAS is a promising device for treating intracranial aneurysms, especially complex and distal aneurysms. This stent can also be used as a powerful tool to assist in rescuing coil migration, completing dual-stent reconstruction, and coiling aneurysms

Indexed as

aneurysmendovascular treatmentNeuroform Atlas stentprognosisreview

Identifiers

PMID35401410
PMCPMC8990925
OpenAlexW4221087234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.