Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35401404›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Applied Bayesian Approaches for Research in Motor Neuron Disease.

Anna G M Temp, Marcel Naumann, Andreas Hermann, Hannes Glaß

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Treatment of task-specific dystonia in sports: A systematic review.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna G M TempTranslational Neurodegeneration Section "Albrecht Kossel," Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
Marcel NaumannTranslational Neurodegeneration Section "Albrecht Kossel," Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
Andreas HermannTranslational Neurodegeneration Section "Albrecht Kossel," Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
Hannes GlaßTranslational Neurodegeneration Section "Albrecht Kossel," Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical evaluation of empirical data is the basis of the modern scientific method. Available tools include various hypothesis tests for specific data structures, as well as methods that are used to quantify the uncertainty of an obtained result. Statistics are pivotal, but many misconceptions arise due to their complexity and difficult-to-acquire mathematical background. Even though most studies rely on a frequentist interpretation of statistical readouts, the application of Bayesian statistics has increased due to the availability of easy-to-use software suites and an increased outreach favouring this topic in the scientific community. Bayesian statistics take our prior knowledge together with the obtained data to express a degree of belief how likely a certain event is. Bayes factor hypothesis testing (BFHT) provides a straightforward method to evaluate multiple hypotheses at the same time and provides evidence that favors the null hypothesis or alternative hypothesis. In the present perspective, we show the merits of BFHT for three different use cases, including a clinical trial, basic research as well as a single case study. Here we show that Bayesian statistics is a viable addition of a scientist's statistical toolset, which can help to interpret data.

Indexed as

amyotrophic lateral sclerosisBayesian statisticsclinical trialsJASPmotor neurone diseasesingle case studiessynthetic datatofersen

Identifiers

PMID35401404
PMCPMC8987707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.