Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35401342›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

From Cognitive Bias Toward Advanced Computational Intelligence for Smart Infrastructure Monitoring.

Meisam Gordan, Ong Zhi Chao, Saeed-Reza Sabbagh-Yazdi, Lai Khin Wee, Khaled Ghaedi, Zubaidah Ismail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meisam GordanDepartment of Civil Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ong Zhi ChaoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Saeed-Reza Sabbagh-YazdiDepartment of Civil Engineering, K. N. TOOSI University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Lai Khin WeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Khaled GhaediDepartment of Civil Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Zubaidah IsmailDepartment of Civil Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual inspections have been typically used in condition assessment of infrastructure. However, they are based on human judgment and their interpretation of data can differ from acquired results. In psychology, this difference is called cognitive bias which directly affects Structural Health Monitoring (SHM)-based decision making. Besides, the confusion between condition state and safety of a bridge is another example of cognitive bias in bridge monitoring. Therefore, integrated computer-based approaches as powerful tools can be significantly applied in SHM systems. This paper explores the relationship between the use of advanced computational intelligence and the development of SHM solutions through conducting an infrastructure monitoring methodology. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based algorithms, i.e., Artificial Neural Network (ANN), hybrid ANN-based Imperial Competitive Algorithm, and hybrid ANN-based Genetic Algorithm, are developed for damage assessment using a lab-scale composite bridge deck structure. Based on the comparison of the results, the employed evolutionary algorithms could improve the prediction error of the pre-developed network by enhancing the learning procedure of the ANN.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebridge monitoringcognitive biasinfrastructure health monitoringsafety

Identifiers

PMID35401342
PMCPMC8990332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.