ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Evaluation of Real-Time Endogenous Brain-Computer Interface Developed Using Ear-Electroencephalography.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Learning for Ear-EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interface: A Systematic Comparison and Design Insights.Biosensors · 2026Article
- EEG Dataset for the Recognition of Different Emotions Induced in Voice-User Interaction.Scientific data · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using ear-electroencephalography (ear-EEG) for the development of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), most of them have been performed using exogenous paradigms in offline environments. To verify the reliable feasibility of constructing ear-EEG-based BCIs, the feasibility of using ear-EEG should be further demonstrated using another BCI paradigm, namely the endogenous paradigm, in real-time online environments. Exogenous and endogenous BCIs are to use the EEG evoked by external stimuli and induced by self-modulation, respectively. In this study, we investigated whether an endogenous ear-EEG-based BCI with reasonable performance can be implemented in online environments that mimic real-world scenarios. To this end, we used three different mental tasks, i.e., mental arithmetic, word association, and mental singing, and performed BCI experiments with fourteen subjects on three different days to investigate not only the reliability of a real-time endogenous ear-EEG-based BCI, but also its test-retest reliability. The mean online classification accuracy was almost 70%, which was equivalent to a marginal accuracy for a practical two-class BCI (70%), demonstrating the feasibility of using ear-EEG for the development of real-time endogenous BCIs, but further studies should follow to improve its performance enough to be used for practical ear-EEG-based BCI applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.