ReviewCancer management and research2022
New Light on Endometrial Thickness as a Risk Factor of Cancer: What Do Clinicians Need to Know?
Review in Cancer management and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of deep myometrial and cervical invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2022Pooled it
- Deciphering the predictors of endometrial nonbenign lesions in asymptomatic postmenopausal women via explainable machine learning.Menopause (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Re-Evaluating the Progesterone Challenge Test as a Physiologic Marker of Endometrial Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Endometrial thickness evaluation with ultrasonography assessment among normal and endometrial cancer across multi-ethnic Indonesian women.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Endometrial Abnormalities in Asymptomatic Postmenopausal Women with Endometrial Thickening.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2025Article
- Endometrial Thickness as a Prognostic Marker in Premenopausal Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: Diagnostic Accuracy and Kaplan-Meier Survival Insights.F1000Research · 2025Observational
- A Multicenter Cohort Study on DNA Methylation for Endometrial Cancer Detection in Cervical Scrapings.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Postmenopausal bleeding: Which endometrial thickness is safe in menopausal hormone therapy users?Case reports in women's health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) represents an accurate and noninvasive technique to investigate endometrial thickness (ET) in the early diagnosis of endometrial cancer (EC). In the literature, for maximum ET there is no consensus on the cutoff value for normal ET in postmenopause for either symptomatic or asymptomatic women. Most patients with EC present with postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) and in these patients is necessary to perform TVUS to evaluate ET as an indicator for endometrial biopsy. On the contrary, if ET is incidentally detected in postmenopausal patients without bleeding, endometrial sampling for a postmenopausal woman without bleeding should not be routinely performed, although it is estimated that up to 15% of EC occurs in women without vaginal bleeding. The aim of our review was to give clinicians necessary and useful knowledge on the role of TVUS and ET for early detection of EC in their daily routine practice. Based on the most important studies in the literature, we summarized that in premenopausal woman with abnormal uterine bleeding, an optimal cutoff for ET has not yet been established. For postmenopausal women with PMB, at low risk, and ET <4 mm, a follow-up scan could be offered, and for women with ET ≥4 mm, office hysteroscopy-guided endometrial sampling is recommended independently of ET results. On the other hand, in postmenopausal women with PMB and at high risk of EC, office hysteroscopy-guided endometrial sampling is necessary. In postmenopausal women without PMB and ET ≥4 mm, arbitrary endometrial sampling is not recommended, but evaluated case by case based on risk factors. In conclusion, there is broad consensus on the importance of TVUS and the need for further investigation based on risk factors of EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.