ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022
Factors Affecting Compliance with Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Qualitative Study Comparing English and Spanish Speakers.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a patient journey map for diabetic retinopathy: exploring evidence from qualitative research.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Digital eyes on diabetes: a systematic review of attitudes toward telemedicine-based retinopathy screening.Oxford open digital health · 2026Article
- Machine learning versus traditional regression models for predicting diabetic retinopathy screening adherence among community-dwelling older adults with diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Identifying facilitators, barriers and areas of opportunity in diabetic retinopathy screening: quality improvement through qualitative methods.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Performance of a Retinal Imaging Camera With On-Device Intelligence for Primary Care: Retrospective Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Results of a New Virtual Program for Patients Overdue for Diabetic Retinopathy Evaluation.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- Use of serum long non-coding RNA expression panel as a marker for diabetic retinopathy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Improving diabetic retinopathy screening at the point of care: integrating telemedicine to overcome current challenges.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- EyeArt artificial intelligence analysis of diabetic retinopathy in retinal screening events.International ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Factors Influencing Eye Screening Adherence Among Latinx Patients With Diabetes: A Qualitative Study.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Factors Associated with Annual Vision Screening in Diabetic Adults: Analysis of the 2019 National Health Interview Survey.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Factors Associated with Ophthalmology Referral and Adherence in a Teleretinal Screening Program: Insights from a Federally Qualified Health Center.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to understand individual-, social-, and system-level factors that affect compliance with recommended diabetic retinopathy (DR)-evaluations, and how these factors vary between English and Spanish speakers. Patients and Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Study subjects included Kaiser Permanente Southern California members with type II diabetes mellitus at least aged 26 years who spoke English or Spanish. Patients were divided into groups based on their adherence with DR evaluations. Our main outcome measure was the major themes expressed by patients that explained their compliance with DR evaluation. Results: Fifty-one participants were enrolled: 30 English speakers (11 nonadherent, 19 adherent) and 21 Spanish speakers (8 nonadherent, 13 adherent). Adherent patients were more likely to have had experience with diabetes and identify as being responsible for their own care. Substantially more non-adherent patients suggested that beliefs and attitudes were the reasons people missed retinopathy appointments. More English-speaking participants tended to be self-directed in managing their healthcare, whereas more Spanish speakers relied on others for help. English speakers also noted better relationships with their physicians. Spanish speakers outlined problems with insurance coverage and costs as barriers. Conclusion: These data suggest two specific intervention strategies that eye care providers could implement to improve adherence with diabetic retinopathy screening and follow up: incorporating a person with DR-related visual loss into the team of staff delivering diabetes support programs and communication campaigns including specific messaging to address fears related to vision loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.