Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35400954›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2022

Molecular prevalence of

Naris Thengchaisri, Tawin Inpankaew, Surapong Arthitwong, Jörg M Steiner, Panpicha Sattasathuchana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Naris ThengchaisriDepartment of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Tawin InpankaewDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Surapong ArthitwongDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jörg M SteinerDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Gastrointestinal Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Panpicha SattasathuchanaDepartment of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kasetsart University · THChulabhorn Hospital · THTexas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Although cats are not natural hosts for heartworm infections ( Materials and Methods: A total of 260 cats (130 pet cats and 130 semi-domesticated cats) were enrolled in this study. Blood samples were placed into ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tubes for hematological analysis and DNA extraction. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to analyze samples for the presence of Results: The prevalence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of Conclusion: From the PCR analysis, it can be concluded that semi-domesticated cats were at higher risk for

Indexed as

catheartwormprevalenceWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID35400954
PMCPMC8980370
OpenAlexW4210475112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.