ReviewJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2022
Quality of Life in Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of salivary mmp-8 gene polymorphism with its protein expression in oral submucous fibrosis patients.Odontology · 2025Article
- Review
- Hindi Translation of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) Questionnaire and its Validation for Oral Submucous Fibrosis Patients: A Pilot Study.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2024Article
- Evaluation and correlation of oral cancer phobia and anxiety in oral submucous fibrosis patients: A cross-sectional study.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgrounds: Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is a chronic, insidious disease and is said to have a multifactorial origin with varied clinical manifestation of repeated oral ulcers, intolerance to spicy food, mucosal blanching resulting in stiffness of the oral mucosa and formation of taut bands leading to reduced mouth opening. We designed this study to systematically review the literature on QOL in OSMF and hope to make recommendations for future course of QOL assessment in OSMF. Methods: An electronic bibliographic search of studies was done from year 1900-2019 using specified keywords. The following databases were searched: PubMed, Ovid, Google Scholar and manual search were done from references of relevant articles. Of the screened 156 articles, finally 10 studies were included after screening for inclusion/exclusion criteria. Quality assessment of studies was completed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) criteria for quantitative studies. Results: Most instruments used in the studies were not disease specific for OSMF except one study. Six types of questionnaires were used. The heterogeneity in study population, study designs, QOL instruments and outcome measures made it difficult for a comparison. Therefore, a quantification analysis was not possible. Also pure OSMF data without the involvement of other lesions were less in number. Conclusions: OSMF not only physically debilitates a patient, it has its repercussions on the social, physical, psychological domains as well. Another aspect is that apart from trismus, which is the most common and evident symptom associated with OSMF, a substantial part of the suffering that ensues is also because of the ulcerations, burning sensation and worsening of dental health. Another focus was the association of worse QOL with a higher grade of disease, longer and higher tobacco abuse contact duration. This review is unable to give a confident answer to the evidence on QOL in OSMF but definitely showers light on the evident lack of robust data on the same. Robust Clinical Trial Registration: PROSPERO Registration: CRD42018102874.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.