ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2022
A Comparative Analysis of Intra-articular Injection of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Arthrocentesis in Temporomandibular Joint Disorders.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preliminary Evidence on Intra-Articular Autologous Conditioned Serum (ACS) in Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (TMDs): A Systematic Review with a Focus on Mechanisms and Potential Application in Clinical Practice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Arthrocentesis for temporomandibular joint disorders: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMC oral health · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma, and platelet-rich fibrin in treating temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Head & face medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Platelet-rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid injection following arthrocentesis for temporomandibular joint disorders under sedation: a comparative clinical study.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Trial
- Effectiveness of arthrocentesis versus other therapeutic modalities in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Systematic review and meta-analysis.The Japanese dental science review · 2026Review
- Autogenous Injections in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Impact of storage techniques on ovine temporomandibular joint discs composition and physicochemical properties.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Using platelet concentrates to treat maxillofacial tissue lesions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Current Clinical Research Directions on Temporomandibular Joint Intra-Articular Injections: A Mapping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Article
- Treatment of Mandibular Hypomobility by Injections into the Temporomandibular Joints: A Systematic Review of the Substances Used.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Minimally invasive intraarticular platelet rich plasma injection for refractory temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome in comparison to arthrocentesis.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) are progressive disorders which lead to development of arthralgia and functional disabilities of temporomandibular joint. The treatment of the TMDs is controversial; noninvasive and minimally invasive therapies have shown a success rate of 70 to 85% for its management. The objective of present study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and arthrocentesis in management of TMDs. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four patients with complaint of reduced mouth opening, joint noise, pain, jaw deviation, not responding to medicinal treatment and coming under group II/III of RDC/TMD were included. Patients were randomly and equally divided in two groups. In group A, arthrocentesis was performed, whereas group B patients underwent intra-articular injections of PRP. Patients were clinically evaluated preoperatively to 12 months postoperatively. Result: Both the groups showed significant improvement in painless mouth opening ( Conclusion: On comparison, both groups were found to have effective treatment modality. However, arthrocentesis has higher success rate for pain elimination, and PRP is more effective in correction of joint noise and jaw deviation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.