Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35400903›Full record

ReviewJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2022

Ameloblastoma and Intracranial Involvement: The Current Challenge of the Radical Surgical Treatment. Comprehensive Review of the Literature and Institution experience.

Daniele Armocida, Luigi Valentino Berra, Resi Pucci, Andrea Battisti, Marco Della Monaca, Valentino Valentini, Antonio Santoro

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Association of MDM2 Overexpression in Ameloblastomas withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniele ArmocidaHuman Neurosciences Department Neurosurgery Division, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Luigi Valentino BerraHuman Neurosciences Department Neurosurgery Division, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Resi PucciDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6237-2334
Andrea BattistiOncological and Reconstructive Maxillo-Facial Surgery Unit. Policlinico, Umberto I Di Roma, Roma, Italy.
Marco Della MonacaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161 Roma, Italy.
Valentino ValentiniDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161 Roma, Italy.
Antonio SantoroHuman Neurosciences Department Neurosurgery Division, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ameloblastoma (AMBL) is an odontogenic tumor, considered to be benign, but aggressive, whose principal risk is a recurrence. The growth can be enormous, and it can extend into the intracranial compartment with serious consequences. Purpose: The intracranial involvement of AMBL is rare, and it may require an extensive surgery. Although it is a rare condition for the neurosurgeon to treat, knowing this condition can lead to a significant increase in survival for these patients. Methods: A case of a 56-year-old woman presented with a history of recurrent left maxilla AMBL with intracranial extension and dural involvement of the anterior and medial cranial fossa is reported, followed by a systematic review of the literature with the aim to identify the best surgical treatment. Results: A total of 32 cases were included in the qualitative analysis. Management is varied and often not described, resulting in an almost complete lack of information and indications for treatment. Radical surgery tends to yield the best outcomes, and it is recommended to have adequate surgical margins when possible. Conclusions: Intracranial involvement from AMBL compartment is an uncommon manifestation of this rare pathology, but which deserves to be treated in a multidisciplinary way in order to ensure maximum surgical radicality. Recurrence reflects failure of the primary surgical resection. If recurrence is the major consideration, surgeons are encouraged to select radical surgery. Whenever a follicular-type maxillary AMBL is diagnosed, it is advisable to check for intracranial spreading and distant metastases during follow-up.

Indexed as

AmeloblastomaCombined approachCraniofacial tumorIntracranial ameloblastomaRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID35400903
PMCPMC8934804
OpenAlexW3201913376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.