ArticleChaos, solitons, and fractals2022
Controlling COVID-19 transmission with isolation of influential nodes.
Article in Chaos, solitons, and fractals, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- IdentifyingInfluential Nodes in Complex Networks Based on the Integration of Smallest-Cycle and Non-Smallest-Cycle Features.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Identifying influential nodes through hierarchical k-shell and extended neighborhood integration.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Finding influential nodes in complex networks based on Kullback-Leibler model within the neighborhood.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- HIV risk and influence factors among MSM who had sought sexual partners in core venues: a continuous sentinel surveillance in 2010-2022.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- The spatiotemporal analysis of the population migration network in China, 2021.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2023Article
- Identifying Vital Nodes in Hypergraphs Based on Von Neumann Entropy.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To understand the transmission dynamics of any infectious disease outbreak, identification of influential nodes plays a crucial role in a complex network. In most infectious disease outbreaks, activities of some key nodes can trigger rapid disease transmission in the population. Identification and immediate isolation of those influential nodes can impede the disease transmission effectively. In this paper, the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method with a novel formula has been proposed to detect the influential and top ranked nodes in a complex social network, which involves analyzing and studying of structural organization of a network. In the proposed TOPSIS method, several centrality measures have been used as multi-attributes of a complex social network. A new formula has been designed for calculating the transmission probability of an epidemic disease to identify the impact of isolating influential nodes. To verify the robustness of the proposed method, we present a comprehensive comparison with five node-ranking methods, which are being used currently for assessing the importance of nodes. The key nodes can be considered as a person, community, cluster or a particular area. The Susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) epidemic model is exploited in two real networks to examine the spreading ability of the nodes, and the results illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Our findings have unearthed that quarantine or isolation of influential nodes following proper health protocols can play a pivotal role in curbing the transmission rate of COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.