Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35400810›Full record

ArticleContemporary family therapy2022

Couple and family therapists' experiences with Telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: a phenomenological analysis.

Edmund W Orlowski, Myrna L Friedlander, Allison Megale, Emily K Peterson, Shayne R Anderson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary family therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Measuring Patient-Reported Acceptability Outcomes via the Program Acceptability Tool for Telehealth.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edmund W OrlowskiDepartment of Educational and Counseling Psychology, University at Albany/SUNY, Albany, USA.
Myrna L FriedlanderDepartment of Educational and Counseling Psychology, University at Albany/SUNY, Albany, USA.
Allison MegaleDepartment of Educational and Counseling Psychology, University at Albany/SUNY, Albany, USA.
Emily K PetersonDepartment of Educational and Counseling Psychology, University at Albany/SUNY, Albany, USA.
Shayne R AndersonSchool of Family Life, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA.
University at Albany, State University of New York · USBrigham Young University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In designing this study, we aimed to obtain a rich, phenomenological understanding of the experiences of couple and family therapists who transitioned their practice to telehealth due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Twelve experienced therapists from the U.S., Spain and Australia were interviewed in depth about their experiences of this transition, particularly how they developed and maintained therapeutic alliances in a virtual context with couples and families suffering pandemic-related hardships. The qualitative analysis identified 40 themes reflecting participants' initial impressions of telehealth and their positive and negative reactions and adjustments to practicing remotely. Upon overcoming some initial wariness about providing services virtually, many participants described advantages to this way of working with families. Indeed, participants were creative in adjusting to this novel therapy modality, finding new ways to connect emotionally with their clients, to work meaningfully with children, to assess in-session dynamics, and to ensure their clients' privacy and safety. Notably, several participants commented on the relatively slower development of alliances with new cases and the challenge of repairing split alliances between family members. Many of these difficulties were described as due to having minimal access to their clients' raw emotions and the inability to use typical systemic interventions, such as moving family members around physically. Participants also reflected on being a "participant observer" to the upheaval caused by the pandemic, a distressing experience they shared with the families in their care.

Indexed as

PandemicSplit allianceTherapeutic allianceWorking alliance

Identifiers

PMID35400810
PMCPMC8978774
OpenAlexW4223498643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.