Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35400561›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

Effectiveness of adenovirus type 5 vectored and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines against symptomatic COVID-19, COVID-19 pneumonia, and severe COVID-19 caused by the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant: Evidence from an outbreak in Yunnan, China, 2021.

Chao Ma, Weiwei Sun, Tingting Tang, Manhong Jia, Yonghua Liu, Yongfang Wan, Jizhou Han, Lance Rodewald, Junhong Li, Yudan Song and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chao MaNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Weiwei SunNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China; Chinese Field Epidemiology Training Program (CFETP), Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China; Hexi District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tianjin, China.
Tingting TangYunnan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Kunming, China.
Manhong JiaYunnan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Kunming, China.
Yonghua LiuRuili County Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ruili County, Dehong Prefecture, Yunnan Province, China.
Yongfang WanRuili County Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ruili County, Dehong Prefecture, Yunnan Province, China.
Jizhou HanDehong Prefectural Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Dehong Prefecture, Yunnan Province, China.
Lance RodewaldNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Junhong LiNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Yudan SongNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Yamin WangNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Dan WuNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Fuzhen WangNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Hui ZhengNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Lin TangNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
George F GaoChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Zundong YinNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China. Electronic address: yinzd@chinacdc.cn.
Zhijie AnNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China. Electronic address: anzj@chinacdc.cn.
Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention · CNYunnan Center for Disease Control And Prevention · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn partial response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, countries around the world are conducting large-scale vaccination campaigns. Real-world estimates of vaccine effectiveness (VE) against the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant are still limited. An outbreak in Ruili city of Chinaprovided an opportunity to evaluate VE against the Delta variant of two types of COVID-19 vaccines in use in China and globally - inactivated (CoronaVac and BBIBP-CorV) and adenovirus type 5 vectored (Convidecia) vaccines.

methodsWe estimated VE using a retrospective cohort study two months after the Ruili vaccination campaign (median: 63 days). Close contacts of infected people (Chinese nationality, 18 years and above) were included to assess VE against symptomatic Covid-19, COVID-19 pneumonia, and severe COVID-19. We calculated the relative risks (RR) of the outcomes for unvaccinated compared with fully vaccinated individuals. We used logistic regression analyses to estimate adjusted VEs, controlling for gender and age group (18-59 years and 60 years and over).We compared unvaccinated and fully vaccinated individuals on duration of RT-PCR positivity and Ct value.

findingsThere were 686 close contacts eligible for VE estimates. Adjusted VE ofad5-vectored vaccine was 61.5% (95% CI, 9.5-83.6) against symptomatic COVID-19, 67.9% (95%CI: 1.7-89.9) against pneumonia, and 100% (95%CI: 36.6-100) against severe/critical illness. For the two inactivated vaccines, combined VE was 74.6% (95% CI, 36.0-90.0) against symptomatic COVID-19, 76.7% (95% CI: 19.3-93.3) against pneumonia, and 100% (95% CI: 47.6-100) against severe/critical COVID-19. There were no statistically significant differences in VE between twoinactivated vaccines for symptomatic COVID-19 and for pneumonia, nor were there statistically significant differences between inactivated and ad5-vectored VE in any of the three outcomes. The median durations of RT-PCR positivity were 17 days for fifteen people vaccinated with an inactivated vaccine, 18 days for forty-four people vaccinated with the Ad5 vectored vaccine, and 26 days for eleven unvaccinated individuals.

interpretationThese results provide reassuring evidence that the three vaccines are effective at preventing Delta-variant COVID-19 in short term following vaccination campaign, and are most effective at preventing more serious illness. The findings of reduced duration of RT-PCR positivity and length of hospital stay associated with full vaccination suggests potential saving of health-care system resources.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdenoviridaeAdolescentAdultChinaDisease OutbreaksHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Young AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesChinaCOVID-19 vaccineDelta variantEffectiveness

Identifiers

PMID35400561
PMCPMC8971107
OpenAlexW4221004306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.