ArticleGM crops & food2022
Genetically modified foods: bibliometric analysis on consumer perception and preference.
Article in GM crops & food, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Public perception of new plant breeding techniques and the psychosocial determinants of acceptance: A systematic review.Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Public perception of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Montenegro: insight for sustainable biotechnology and policy development.GM crops & food · 2026Article
- How labeling of genetically modified foods affects consumers' purchase intentions: a multi-contextual analysis.GM crops & food · 2025Article
- Genetically modified crops and sustainable development: navigating challenges and opportunities.Food science and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Genetically modified organisms and sustainable development goals: A survey of Taiwanese public opinion.PloS one · 2025Article
- Rethinking progress: harmonizing the discourse on genetically modified crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Consumers' response to genetically modified food: an Italian case study.GM crops & food · 2024Article
- Developing Food Consumer Attitudes towards Ionizing Radiation and Genetic Modification.Nutrients · 2024Article
- A review on regulatory aspects, challenges and public perception in acceptance of genetically modified foods.Food science and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Multiplex PCR detection method of genetically modified canola event (MON94100, LBFLFK, and NS-B50027-4) combined with capillary electrophoresis.Food science and biotechnology · 2024Article
- A review and outlook on expression of animal proteins in plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Impacts of knowledge and trust on consumer perceptions and purchase intentions towards genetically modified foods.PloS one · 2024Article
- What do popular YouTube videos say about genetically modified foods? A content analysis.Dialogues in health · 2023Article
- Consumption of Genetically Modified Food Products and Its Determinants (Case Study: Edible Oil in Mashhad).Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Consumer Attitude towards Genetically Modified Foods in Iran: Application of Three-Dimensional Model of Corporate Social Responsibility.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Unlocking the potential of stem cells: Their crucial role in the production of cultivated meat.Current research in food science · 2023Review
- Managers' attitudes toward gene-editing technology and companies' R&D investment in gene-editing: the case of Chinese seed companies.GM crops & food · 2022Article
- Innovative Application of SERS in Food Quality and Safety: A Brief Review of Recent Trends.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The implicit and explicit attitudes of Chinese university students towards genetic modification.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Genetically engineered crops for sustainably enhanced food production systems.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we present the bibliometric trends emerging from research outputs on consumer perception and preference for genetically modified (GM) foods and policy prescriptions for enabling the consumption using VOSviewer visualization software. Consumers' positive response is largely influenced by the decision of the governments to ban or approve the GM crops cultivation. Similarly, the public support increases when the potential benefits of the technology are well articulated, consumption increases with a price discount, people's trust on the government and belief in science increases with a positive influence by the media. Europe and the USA are the first region and country, respectively, in terms of the number of active institutions per research output, per-capita GDP publication and citations. We suggest research-, agri-food industries-, and society-oriented policies to be implemented by the stakeholders to ensure the safety of GM foods, encourage consumer-based studies, and increase public awareness toward these food products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.