Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35400081›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2022

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ): Measurement Properties and Estimated Clinically Meaningful Thresholds From a Phase 3 Study.

Paul Williams, Thomas Burke, Josephine M Norquist, Christina Daskalopoulou, Rebecca M Speck, Ayman Samkari, Sonya Eremenco, Stephen Joel Coons

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Meaningful change threshold estimation for the non-small cell lung cancer symptom assessment questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ): psychometric analysis from a phase 3 trial (LIBRETTO-431).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Trial
  3. Patient-reported outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer: psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS PF-SF 8c and NSCLC-SAQ in two phase 3 clinical trials.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul WilliamsPatient-Centered Solutions, IQVIA, Paris, France.
Thomas BurkeCenter for Observational and Real World Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey.
Josephine M NorquistPatient-Centered Endpoints & Strategy, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey.
Christina DaskalopoulouPatient-Centered Solutions, IQVIA, Athens, Greece.
Rebecca M SpeckClinical Outcome Assessment Program, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona.
Ayman SamkariClinical Research, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey.
Sonya EremencoClinical Outcome Assessment Program, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona.
Stephen Joel CoonsClinical Outcome Assessment Program, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona.
Critical Path Institute · USMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USIQVIA (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The NSCLC Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ) was developed to assess NSCLC symptom severity in accordance with Food and Drug Administration evidentiary expectations leading to Food and Drug Administration qualification in 2018. This study evaluated the NSCLC-SAQ's measurement properties within a clinical trial. Methods: The KEYNOTE-598 phase 3 study of participants with stage IV metastatic NSCLC with programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score greater than or equal to 50% was used to assess the NSCLC-SAQ's reliability, construct validity, responsiveness, and estimate clinically meaningful within-person change. Other patient-reported outcome measures included patient global impression items of severity and change in lung cancer symptoms, and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire core 30 and lung cancer module, LC13. Results: Participants (N = 560) were mostly men (70%), had a mean age of 64 years, and had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 (64%) or 0 (36%). Internal consistency at baseline (Cronbach's α = 0.74) and test-retest reliability after 3 weeks (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.79) were satisfactory. NSCLC-SAQ items, domains, and total score correlated moderately to highly with patient-reported outcome measures capturing similar content, and the total score differentiated among patient global impression of severity groups ( Conclusions: The NSCLC-SAQ was found to be reliable, valid, responsive, and interpretable for assessing symptom improvement in NSCLC. Further evaluation is recommended in trial participants whose symptoms worsen over time.

Indexed as

Clinically meaningful within-person changeNon–small cell lung carcinomaPatient-reported outcomePsychometric propertiesSymptom assessment

Identifiers

PMID35400081
PMCPMC8983345
OpenAlexW4213163701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.