Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35400077›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Prevalence, Predictors and Point of View Toward Self-Medication Among Residents of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Basheerahmed Abdulaziz Mannasaheb, Sarah Abdulrahman Alajlan, Jaber Abdullah Alshahrani, Noordin Othman, Sultan Othman Alolayan, Mohammed Saleh Alamrah, Syed Mohammed Basheeruddin Asdaq, Awad Mohammed Al-Qahtani, Ibrahim Ahmed Shaikh, Mohammed Yahia Alasmary

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Use of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly patients in tertiary care hospital of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Basheerahmed Abdulaziz MannasahebDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sarah Abdulrahman AlajlanPharm.D Student, College of Pharmacy, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Jaber Abdullah AlshahraniConsultant Family Medicine, Armed Forces Hospitals, Khamis Mushayt, Saudi Arabia.
Noordin OthmanClinical and Hospital Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia.
Sultan Othman AlolayanClinical and Hospital Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Saleh AlamrahGeneral Practitioner Physician at Almansk PHCC, Directorate of Health Affairs in Asir Region, Ministry of Health, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Syed Mohammed Basheeruddin AsdaqDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Awad Mohammed Al-QahtaniDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim Ahmed ShaikhDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Yahia AlasmaryMedical Department, College of Medicine, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Alfaisal University · SANajran University · SAArmed Forces Hospital · SAManagement and Science University · MYTaibah University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irrational Self-Medication (SM) practice leads to incorrect diagnosis and is a risk factor for disease exacerbation and serious health consequences. Hence Responsible SM is vital for better health outcomes. In the present community-based study we explored the SM practice during the last 3 months, frequency, outcome, medications used, reasons influencing SM, source of the drug, and information. Data were analyzed using SPSS; chi-square test was performed to indicate significance, Odds ratio, Pearson correlation, univariant and multivariant regression analysis were performed to find out factors and predictors of SM. A total of 611 residents completed the survey. SM was practiced by 52.9% of participants during the last 3 months, with a frequency of one to two times. Headache (64.8%), pain (35.4%), fever/flu (31.4%), cold & cough (21.9%) and dysmenorrhea (20.9%) were illnesses managed using pain killers (75.9%), multivitamins (25.5%), anti-pyretic (24.7%) and herbal medicines (18.5%). Minor illness (67.9%), earlier experience (33.9%) and shortness of time to attend healthcare facilities (18.8%) were the reasons for practicing SM. Distance to healthcare and routine physical activity have significantly influenced the SM practice. Residents stated that inappropriate SM would lead to negative outcomes, including drug side effects (70%), Interaction (34.2%), poor treatment outcome (32.6%) and return of symptoms (26.5%). Interestingly, two-thirds of participants (68.9%) have recommended SM in case of minor illnesses only, 85.3% of respondents have expressed their desire to learn more about appropriate SM, and 76.6% are willing to return their leftover or unused medications to drug take-back centers.

Indexed as

PainSelf MedicationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPrevalenceSaudi Arabiacommunityopinionsover the counter drugsRiyadh (Saudi-Arabia)self-medication

Identifiers

PMID35400077
PMCPMC8989923
OpenAlexW4226343529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.