Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35400053›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2022

A Modified Implementation Mapping Methodology for Evaluating and Learning From Existing Implementation.

Marie-Therese Schultes, Bianca Albers, Laura Caci, Emanuela Nyantakyi, Lauren Clack

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identifying Mechanisms of Action for Implementation Strategies Using a Retrospective Implementation Mapping Logic Model Approach.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. "Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Why Veterinarians (Do Not) Adhere to the Clinical PracticeAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Research and Scholarly Methods: Implementation Science Studies.Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marie-Therese SchultesFaculty of Medicine, Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bianca AlbersFaculty of Medicine, Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Laura CaciFaculty of Medicine, Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Emanuela NyantakyiFaculty of Medicine, Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lauren ClackFaculty of Medicine, Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When empirically supported interventions are implemented in real-world practice settings, the process of how these interventions are implemented is highly relevant for their potential success. Implementation Mapping is a method that provides step-by-step guidance for systematically designing implementation processes that fit the respective intervention and context. It includes needs assessments among relevant stakeholders, the identification of implementation outcomes and determinants, the selection and design of appropriate implementation strategies, the production of implementation protocols and an implementation outcome evaluation. Implementation Mapping is generally conceptualized as a tool to prospectively guide implementation. However, many implementation efforts build on previous or ongoing implementation efforts, i.e., "existing implementation." Learnings from existing implementation may offer insights critical to the success of further implementation activities. In this article, we present a modified Implementation Mapping methodology to be applied when evaluating existing implementation. We illustrate the methodology using the example of evaluating ongoing organized colorectal cancer screening programs in Switzerland. Through this example, we describe how we identify relevant stakeholders, implementation determinants and outcomes as well as currently employed implementation strategies. Moreover, we describe how we compare the types of strategies that are part of existing implementation efforts with those that implementation science would suggest as being suited to address identified implementation determinants. The results can be used for assessing the current state of implementation outcomes, refining ongoing implementation strategies, and informing future implementation efforts.

Indexed as

Implementation ScienceSwitzerlandexisting implementationimplementation experienceImplementation Mappingimplementation strategiesstakeholder engagementtailored implementation

Identifiers

PMID35400053
PMCPMC8984087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.