ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis
The Impact of Metastatic Lymph Node Size on Long-term Outcomes for pStage III Colon Cancer.
Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A nomogram model for predicting lymph node metastasis of rectal cancer by combining preoperative magnetic resonance imaging signs and tumour markers.Polish journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Clinical significance of the histopathological metastatic largest lymph node size in colorectal cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To clarify the impact of metastatic lymph node size on long-term outcomes in patients undergoing curative colectomy for pathological stage III colon cancer. Patients and Methods: This study enrolled patients who underwent curative colectomy for pStage III colon cancer between January 2013 and December 2015. All patients were divided into four groups based on the short-axis diameter of the largest MLN: Group A, <5 mm; Group B, ≥5 mm and <10 mm; Group C, ≥10 mm and <15 mm; Group D, ≥15 mm. Results: A total of 209 patients were analyzed. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of Groups A, B, C, and D were 82.3%, 74.6%, 74.5% and 60.7%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, Group D (hazard ratio=3.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-11.65; p=0.01) was independently associated with worse RFS. Conclusion: Bulky MLNs might be a poor prognostic factor in node-positive colon cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.