Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35399997›Full record

ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis

Clinical Implication of KRAS Mutation Variants in Patients With Resected Colon Cancer.

Jin Ho Baek, Juhyung Kim, Dong Won Baek, Eunhye Chang, Hye Jin Kim, Su Yeon Park, Jun Seok Park, Gyu Seog Choi, Byung Woog Kang, Jong Gwang Kim

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jin Ho BaekDepartment of Oncology/Hematology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Cancer Research Institute, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Juhyung KimDepartment of Oncology/Hematology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Cancer Research Institute, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Dong Won BaekDepartment of Oncology/Hematology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Cancer Research Institute, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Eunhye ChangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Hye Jin KimDepartment of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Su Yeon ParkDepartment of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Jun Seok ParkDepartment of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Gyu Seog ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Byung Woog KangDepartment of Oncology/Hematology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Cancer Research Institute, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Jong Gwang KimDepartment of Oncology/Hematology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Cancer Research Institute, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Kyungpook National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: This study evaluated the clinical implication of KRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase (KRAS) mutation variants in patients with resected colon cancer (CC). Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 482 patients diagnosed with CC who underwent curative surgical resection at Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital. The inclusion criteria were: Pathologically diagnosed with primary CC; stage I-III CC according to the 7th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system; and with available test results for KRAS mutation status. In total, 345 patients met these criteria and were included in this study. Results: Among the 345 patients, 140 (40.6%) exhibited KRAS mutations, with their incidences as follows: 90/140 (64.3%) in exon 2 codon 12, 37/140 (26.4%) in exon 2 codon 13, 1/140 (0.1%) in exon 3 codon 59, 7/140 (5.0%) in exon 3 codon 61, and 5/140 (3.6%) in exon 4 codon 146. KRAS mutation status was not a significant prognostic factor for disease-free survival or overall survival. Although there were no significant differences in survival between patients with exon 2 codon 12 and exon 2 codon 13 mutations, poorer disease-free survival (p=0.085) and overall survival (p=0.005) were seen in those with exon 3 codon 61 mutation than in others. Conclusion: KRAS mutation status was not correlated with survival, but exon 3 codon 61 mutation might be a factor for poor prognosis in patients after resection of CC.

Indexed as

Colon cancerKRASPNAClamp™prognosis

Identifiers

PMID35399997
PMCPMC8962850
OpenAlexW4206786668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.