ArticleArthroplasty today2022
Content Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Forgotten Joint Score Questionnaire in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early recovery patterns differ between medially congruent and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty, with comparable 2-year outcomes: A triple-blinded randomized clinical trial.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Interconverting the Joint Awareness Score and the Forgotten Joint Score: A Crosswalk Analysis.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Forgotten Joint Score usage in total hip arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Dual Mobility Acetabular Cup Utilization in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Mitigating Instability Risks.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Persian Version of the Harris Hip Score.Arthroplasty today · 2023Article
- Predictors of Core Decompression Success in Patients with Femoral Head Avascular Necrosis.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2023Article
- Femoral Stem Dislocation Caused by Trunnionosis Along with Adverse Local Tissue Reaction: A Case Report and a New Technique of Head to Cone Cementing.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is a patient-reported outcome measurement that evaluates patients' ability to forget the replaced joint (knee or hip) in everyday activity. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Persian version of this questionnaire in Iranian patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty. Methods: A team of specialists reviewed this questionnaire and voted for its clarity and content validity. Then, the FJS was filled out by 100 randomly selected total hip arthroplasty patients between 2019 and 2021 with at least 6 months of follow-up. The reliability coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) was calculated. Results: A total of 95 patients who met the inclusion criteria, with the mean age 59.9 ± 11.6 years and 26.6% being female, participated in the study. Patients had no difficulty with the content and linguistic format of the Persian FJS-12. The mean FJS for these patients was 50.8 ± 4.6. The Cronbach's alpha was measured at 0.87. The mean content validity index was 0.93. Conclusion: FJS-12 can discriminate even patients with eximious pain and functional outcomes after joint reconstruction surgery. The Persian format of FJS-12 showed acceptable internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and acceptable content validity. Therefore, it can be utilized in the Iranian population for future research studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.