Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35399872›Full record

ArticlePhilosophy & technology2022

The German Act on Autonomous Driving: Why Ethics Still Matters.

Alexander Kriebitz, Raphael Max, Christoph Lütge

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophy & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander KriebitzChair of Business Ethics, TUM School of Governance, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Muenchen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7959-5980
Raphael MaxChair of Business Ethics, TUM School of Governance, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Muenchen, Germany.
Christoph LütgeChair of Business Ethics, TUM School of Governance, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Muenchen, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The German Act on Autonomous Driving constitutes the first national framework on level four autonomous vehicles and has received attention from policy makers, AI ethics scholars and legal experts in autonomous driving. Owing to Germany's role as a global hub for car manufacturing, the following paper sheds light on the act's position within the ethical discourse and how it reconfigures the balance between legislation and ethical frameworks. Specifically, in this paper, we highlight areas that need to be more worked out in the future either through ethical conventions, corporate measures or legal measures and examine how the law can be incorporated into the existing discourse on the regulation of technologies. Based on this examination, we derive implications for future discourse and elaborate on companies' responsibilities in developing autonomous driving technologies in an ethical sense.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceAutonomous drivingDigital ethicsEthicsTechnical oversight

Identifiers

PMID35399872
PMCPMC8979579
OpenAlexW4226185981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.