ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022
Feasibility Analysis of Wearables Guiding Scientific Movements and Promoting Health.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retracted: Feasibility Analysis of Wearables Guiding Scientific Movements and Promoting Health.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2022-11-23Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wearable devices have gradually integrated into people's healthy lives because of their mobility, portability, and other characteristics, and have shown their value and status in sports and health. Wearable devices can be used to capture a large amount of human body activity data, but how to effectively use these data to serve people and help people form a healthy lifestyle is a problem to be considered. In order to further study the feasibility of wearable devices to guide scientific movements and promote health, a new layered motion recognition algorithm is proposed in this study. In this study, a C4.5-based decision tree algorithm is used to identify the state layer, and only the mean and variance features are extracted from the acceleration sensor data. Three corresponding BP neural network classifiers are constructed and classified. Each classifier is responsible for identifying actions in the corresponding states and verifying the method in this study through experiments. The experimental results in this study show that the recognition rate of the mRMR feature selection recognition algorithm is 1.13% higher than the BE algorithm and 2.02% higher than the recognition method without any feature selection algorithm. In addition, the research in this article found that wearable devices can realize the real-time detection of the physiological indicators of the wearer throughout the day to evaluate the efficacy of the drug and apply it to the early detection and treatment of diseases, which may improve patient compliance and promote health to a certain extent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.