Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35399824›Full record

ArticlePhytomedicine plus : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology2021

Computational and network pharmacology studies of

Rupesh V Chikhale, Saurabh K Sinha, Pukar Khanal, Nilambari S Gurav, Muniappan Ayyanar, Satyendra K Prasad, Manish M Wanjari, Rajesh B Patil, Shailendra S Gurav

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Phytomedicine plus : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Aqueous Extract ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Rupesh V ChikhaleUCL School of Pharmacy, Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, United Kingdom.
Saurabh K SinhaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mohanlal Shukhadia University, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313 001, India.
Pukar KhanalDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, KLE College of Pharmacy, KLE, Academy of Higher Education and Research (KAHER), Belagavi 590010, India.
Nilambari S GuravDepartment of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, PES's Rajaram and Tarabai Bandekar College of Pharmacy, Ponda, Goa University, Goa 403401, India.
Muniappan AyyanarDepartment of Botany, A.V.V.M. Sri Pushpam College (Autonomous), Bharathidasan University, Poondi, Thanjavur 613 503, India.
Satyendra K PrasadDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, R.T.M. University, Nagpur, Maharashtra 440033, India.
Manish M WanjariRegional Ayurveda Research Institute for Drug Development, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Rajesh B PatilSinhgad Technical Education Society's, Smt. Kashibai Navale College of Pharmacy, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Shailendra S GuravDepartment of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, Goa College of Pharmacy, Panaji, Goa University, Goa- 403 001, India.
Goa University · INBharathidasan University · INCentral Council for Research in Ayurvedic Science · INKLE University · INMedway School of Pharmacy · GBMohanlal Sukhadia University · INRashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University · INSmt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Since December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 had been a significant threat globally, which has accounted for about two million deaths. Several types of research are undergoing and have reported the significant role of repurposing existing drugs and natural lead in the treatment of COVID-19. The plant Purpose: The present study was undertaken to investigate the potency of the several components of Methods: The docking simulation studies were carried out using Schrödinger maestro 2018-1 MM share version, while dynamics studies were conducted to understand the binding mechanism and the complexes' stability studies. Results: Out of sixty-six tested compounds, Chlorogenic acid, Quercitrin, and Myricetin were most effective in showing the highest binding energy against selected protein targets of SARS-CoV-2. The network pharmacology analysis study confirmed these compounds' role in modulating the immune response, inflammatory cascade, and cytokine storm through different signaling pathways. Conclusion: Current pharmacoinformatic approach shows possible role of

Indexed as

AmlakiAyurvedaChlorogenic acidCOVID19Emblica officinalisMolecular DynamicsMyricetinPandemic

Identifiers

PMID35399824
PMCPMC8276571
OpenAlexW3177993672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.