ArticleCommunications in statistics: theory and methods2022
Confidence Interval Estimation of the Youden index and corresponding cut-point for a combination of biomarkers under normality.
Article in Communications in statistics: theory and methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of the ADGRG6 hotspot mutations in urine for bladder cancer early screening by ARMS-qPCR.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- The Utility of Pre-Treatment Inflammation Markers as Associative Factors to the Adverse Outcomes of Vulvar Cancer: A Study on Staging, Nodal Involvement, and Metastasis Models.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Accurate interval estimation for the risk difference in an incomplete correlated 2 × 2 table: Calf immunity analysis.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In prognostic/diagnostic medical research, it is often the goal to identify a biomarker that differentiates between patients with and without a condition, or patients that will have good or poor response to a given treatment. The statistical literature is abundant with methods for evaluating single biomarkers for these purposes. However, in practice, a single biomarker rarely captures all aspects of a disease process; therefore, it is often the case that using a combination of biomarkers will improve discriminatory ability. A variety of methods have been developed for combining biomarkers based on the maximization of some global measure or cost-function. These methods usually create a score based on a linear combination of the biomarkers, upon which the standard single biomarker methodologies (such as the Youden's index) are applied. However, these single biomarker methodologies do not account for the multivariable nature of the combined biomarker score. In this article we present generalized inference and bootstrap approaches to estimating confidence intervals for the Youden's index and corresponding cut-point for a combined biomarker. These methods account for inherent dependencies and provide accurate and efficient estimates. A simulation study and real-world example utilize data from a Duchene Muscular Dystrophy study are also presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.