Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35399822›Full record

ArticleCommunications in statistics: theory and methods2022

Confidence Interval Estimation of the Youden index and corresponding cut-point for a combination of biomarkers under normality.

Kristopher Attwood, Lili Tian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications in statistics: theory and methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kristopher AttwoodDept. of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Lili TianDept. of Biostatistics, University at Buffalo.

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI Christine B. Ambrosone · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
YAP1 and RB1 cooperate to regulate lung cancer lineage plasticity and therapeutic resistanceU24CA274159 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI DAVID W. GOODRICH, Alan David Hutson · 2022 to 2026
$8.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS U24 CA274159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In prognostic/diagnostic medical research, it is often the goal to identify a biomarker that differentiates between patients with and without a condition, or patients that will have good or poor response to a given treatment. The statistical literature is abundant with methods for evaluating single biomarkers for these purposes. However, in practice, a single biomarker rarely captures all aspects of a disease process; therefore, it is often the case that using a combination of biomarkers will improve discriminatory ability. A variety of methods have been developed for combining biomarkers based on the maximization of some global measure or cost-function. These methods usually create a score based on a linear combination of the biomarkers, upon which the standard single biomarker methodologies (such as the Youden's index) are applied. However, these single biomarker methodologies do not account for the multivariable nature of the combined biomarker score. In this article we present generalized inference and bootstrap approaches to estimating confidence intervals for the Youden's index and corresponding cut-point for a combined biomarker. These methods account for inherent dependencies and provide accurate and efficient estimates. A simulation study and real-world example utilize data from a Duchene Muscular Dystrophy study are also presented.

Indexed as

Duchene Muscular DystrophyGeneralized InferenceLinear CombinationsROC AnalysisYouden index

Identifiers

PMID35399822
PMCPMC8991305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.