ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2022
Assessment of egg and milk allergies among Indians by revalidating a food allergy predictive model.
Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The recent upsurge in food allergy indicates the need for accurate medical diagnostics. The application of predictive diagnostic models can envisage the outcome of oral food challenge (OFC), reducing cost and time. A logistic regression model was developed by DunnGalvin for children predicting OFC outcome using six predictors viz: sex, age, history, specific IgE, total IgE minus specific IgE, and skin prick test. This model was later updated by Klemans, reducing the number of predictors enhancing the calibration and discrimination of outcome. Objective: Our aim was to revalidate both the models for assessment of egg and milk allergies among Indians in the age group 0-19 years and to determine regression coefficients for our study population. Methods: Revalidation was done at the allergy clinic using OFC outcomes of egg and milk allergic patients. Precise values of the predictors were set up for which calibration (predicted against observed outcome) and discrimination (area under curve [AUC] of receiver operator characteristic curve [ROC]) would be better. Results: The Klemans model with reduced number of predictors showed better accuracy, calibration and discrimination than the DunnGalvin. Best calibration for egg allergy was achieved in the Klemans model with correlation coefficient (r Conclusion: The present study showed that mathematical models are non-invasive and can be successfully used as appropriate alternative to OFC in Indian population after proper validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.