ArticleCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental2022
The Hepatorenal Syndrome Patient Pathway: Retrospective Analysis of Electronic Health Records.
Article in Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges in the Treatment of Hepatorenal Syndrome-Acute Kidney Injury: A US Chart Review of Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Early Diagnosis and Timely Terlipressin in Hepatorenal Syndrome Improves Projected Outcomes and Lowers Cost.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2025Article
- Incidence and outcomes of acute kidney injury including hepatorenal syndrome in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis in the US.Journal of hepatology · 2023Article
- Treatment-Related Cost Analysis of Terlipressin for Adults with Hepatorenal Syndrome with Rapid Reduction in Kidney Function.Advances in therapy · 2023Article
- Improving Outcomes in Hepatorenal Syndrome-Acute Kidney Injury With Early Diagnoses and Implementation of Approved Treatment Regimens.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023Article
- Improving the Management of Hepatorenal Syndrome-Acute Kidney Injury Using an Updated Guidance and a New Treatment Paradigm.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is among the leading causes of hospitalization and mortality in patients with chronic liver disease. Objective: To assess the HRS patient journey from preadmission to postdischarge to understand patient characteristics, disease progression, treatment patterns, and outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using real-world data from a nationwide electronic health record database (Cerner Health Facts, Kansas City, Missouri). We used ICD-9/10 diagnosis codes to identify patients hospitalized with HRS between January 1, 2009, and January 31, 2018. We assessed patient characteristics and history, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes. Regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between patient characteristics and survival while adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates. Results: The study included 3563 patients (62% men). Precipitants of HRS included gastrointestinal bleeding (18%), diuretics and infections (30%), and paracentesis (26%). Although 21% of patients had liver injury exclusively associated with alcohol use, 20% had hepatitis C, 8% had nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and the etiology of the remainder (51%) was either some combination of conditions or unknown. A total of 42% of patients received vasopressors, including octreotide and midodrine (10%), other combinations of vasopressors (11%), or another single vasopressor (21%). In-hospital mortality was 34%, and 14% of patients were discharged to hospice. Regression analysis showed patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure had higher mortality in acute-on-chronic liver failure grades 1 (odds ratio = 1.59), 2 (odds ratio = 2.49), and 3 (odds ratio = 4.53) versus no acute-on-chronic liver failure. Among survivor patients, 38% were readmitted within 90 days of discharge; 23% of readmissions were HRS-related. Conclusions: The HRS patient journey presented in this study highlights inconsistencies in, and provides insight into, associated hospital-based treatment strategies. A mortality rate of 34% along with a readmission rate of 23% associated with HRS-related complications warrant more disease awareness and effective treatment. Further research is needed to examine the interactions between the etiology of cirrhosis, precipitants, treatment, and outcomes. (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.