Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35399758›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of supercomputing2022

On the performance evaluation of object classification models in low altitude aerial data.

Payal Mittal, Akashdeep Sharma, Raman Singh, Arun Kumar Sangaiah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of supercomputing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Payal MittalUIET Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.
Akashdeep SharmaUIET Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.
Raman SinghThapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, India.
Arun Kumar SangaiahSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper compares the classification performance of machine learning classifiers vs. deep learning-based handcrafted models and various pretrained deep networks. The proposed study performs a comprehensive analysis of object classification techniques implemented on low-altitude UAV datasets using various machine and deep learning models. Multiple UAV object classification is performed through widely deployed machine learning-based classifiers such as K nearest neighbor, decision trees, naïve Bayes, random forest, a deep handcrafted model based on convolutional layers, and pretrained deep models. The best result obtained using random forest classifiers on the UAV dataset is 90%. The handcrafted deep model's accuracy score suggests the efficacy of deep models over machine learning-based classifiers in low-altitude aerial images. This model attains 92.48% accuracy, which is a significant improvement over machine learning-based classifiers. Thereafter, we analyze several pretrained deep learning models, such as VGG-D, InceptionV3, DenseNet, Inception-ResNetV4, and Xception. The experimental assessment demonstrates nearly 100% accuracy values using pretrained VGG16- and VGG19-based deep networks. This paper provides a compilation of machine learning-based classifiers and pretrained deep learning models and a comprehensive classification report for the respective performance measures.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networksDeep learningMachine learningObject recognitionUAV datasets

Identifiers

PMID35399758
PMCPMC8982665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.