Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35399679›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022

Reduced Growth, Altered Gut Microbiome and Metabolite Profile, and Increased Chronic Kidney Disease Risk in Young Pigs Consuming a Diet Containing Highly Resistant Protein.

Margaret Murray, Melinda T Coughlan, Anne Gibbon, Vinod Kumar, Francine Z Marques, Sophie Selby-Pham, Matthew Snelson, Kirill Tsyganov, Gary Williamson, Trent M Woodruff and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Resistant Protein: Forms and Functions.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret MurraySchool of Chemistry, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Melinda T CoughlanDepartment of Diabetes, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Anne GibbonMonash Animal Research Platform, Monash University, Churchill, VIC, Australia.
Vinod KumarSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Francine Z MarquesHypertension Research Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Sophie Selby-PhamSchool of Chemistry, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Matthew SnelsonDepartment of Diabetes, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kirill TsyganovHypertension Research Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Gary WilliamsonDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia.
Trent M WoodruffSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Tong WuSchool of Chemistry, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Louise E BennettSchool of Chemistry, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Monash University · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-heat processed foods contain proteins that are partially resistant to enzymatic digestion and pass through to the colon. The fermentation of resistant proteins by gut microbes produces products that may contribute to chronic disease risk. This pilot study examined the effects of a resistant protein diet on growth, fecal microbiome, protein fermentation metabolites, and the biomarkers of health status in pigs as a model of human digestion and metabolism. Weanling pigs were fed with standard or resistant protein diets for 4 weeks. The resistant protein, approximately half as digestible as the standard protein, was designed to enter the colon for microbial fermentation. Fecal and blood samples were collected to assess the microbiome and circulating metabolites and biomarkers. The resistant protein diet group consumed less feed and grew to ~50% of the body mass of the standard diet group. The diets had unique effects on the fecal microbiome, as demonstrated by clustering in the principal coordinate analysis. There were 121 taxa that were significantly different between groups (adjusted-

Indexed as

inflammationkidney functionmetabolomicsmicrobiomeprotein fermentationresistant protein

Identifiers

PMID35399679
PMCPMC8988180
OpenAlexW4220867547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.