Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35399632›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

Efficacy of Chinese Medicine Injection for Cardiotoxic Injury of Anthracycline Chemotherapy Drugs: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Mingxuan Li, Hongdian Li, Hongxu Liu, Xiaolei Lai, Wenlong Xing

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mingxuan LiBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2250-5213
Hongdian LiBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4888-3469
Hongxu LiuBeijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6757-6763
Xiaolei LaiBeijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5421-8249
Wenlong XingBeijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8839-665X
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chinese medicine injections (CMIs) are widely used in the prevention and treatment of cardiotoxicity caused by anthracycline chemotherapeutic drugs. However, it is uncertain that CMIs are more effective in combating the cardiotoxicity of anthracyclines. The aim of this Network Meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the treatment effects of various CMIs in order to determine the best CMI for the prevention and treatment of cardiac damage from anthracyclines. Methods: The Chinese Journal Full Text Database (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Chinese Science and Technology Journal Full Text Database (VIP), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to screen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CMIs against cardiotoxicity of anthracycline-based chemotherapeutic drugs. The search time frame was all from the establishment of the database to October 1, 2021. After independent screening of the literature, extraction of information and evaluation of the risk of bias of the included studies by two evaluators, mesh meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3, Stata 15.1, and ADDIS 1.16.8 software. Results: A total of 33 studies including 2783 patients, including 1410 cases in the experimental group and 1373 cases in the control group were included, and six CMIs were extracted, namely, Shenfu injection, Shenmai injection, Shenqi Fuzheng injection, Shengmai injection, Xinmailong injection, and Haungqi injection. The results of the reticulated meta-analysis showed that in terms of ST-T segment (ECG change) change rate, Haungqi injection, Shenfu injection, and Xinmailong injection were superior. In terms of lowering CK-MB, Huangqi Injection and Shenqi Fuzheng injection were superior. In terms of improving Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), Shenfu injection, Huangqi Injection, and Shengmai injection were more effective than other injections. In terms of improving LVEDD, Shengmai injection, Huangqi Injection, and Xinmailong injection have advantages. Conclusion: The six CMIs included in this study are effective against cardiotoxicity caused by anthracycline-based chemotherapeutic agents. Huangqi Injection and Shenfu injection are both superior in improving various outcome indicators. There is still a need for larger, high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the various CMIs in a more refined way.

Identifiers

PMID35399632
PMCPMC8991398
OpenAlexW4221025116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.