ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2022
Intermittent chest tube clamping decreases chest tube duration time and drainage volume after lung cancer surgery in patients without air leak: an open-label, randomized controlled trial.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03379350 (The Impacts of Intermittent Chest Tube Clamping on Chest Tube Drainage Duration and Postoperative Hospital Stay After Lung Cancer Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Impacts of Intermittent Chest Tube Clamping on Chest Tube Drainage Duration and Postoperative Hospital Stay After Lung Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Study
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of chest tube clamping versus non-clamping prior to removal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Effects of suturing of the mediastinal pleura on lessening pleural effusions after lobectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Rare complications after esophagectomy: incidence, clinical features, risk factors, management, and prevention.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Our previous retrospective study proved the safety and effectiveness of chest tube clamping in terms of shortening chest tube duration. However, it needed to be verified by a prospective study. This study sought to determine if intermittent chest tube clamping decreases chest tube duration and total drainage volume after lung cancer surgery in patients without air leak. Methods: Patients with resectable lung cancer scheduled to undergo lobectomy were identified as potential candidates. Once the re-expansion of the lung was confirmed via radiography the morning of postoperative day 1 and no air leak was detected, 180 patients were randomly assigned to intermittent chest tube clamping (the clamping group, n=90) or continuous gravity drainage (the control group, n=90). The primary outcome was chest tube drainage duration. Pleural drainage volume and adverse events were also recorded. Results: Of 180 patients, 12 were subsequently withdrawn from the study for various reasons. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the chest tube drainage duration was significantly shorter {median [interquartile range]: 2 [2, 3] Conclusions: Our study indicates that chest tube clamping decreased the duration of chest tube drainage and drainage volume without causing adverse effects. Its wider application may help reduce medical costs and increase patient comfort. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03379350.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.