ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2022
Utility and safety of sole electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy under moderate sedation for lung cancer diagnosis.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Diagnostic Value and Safety of Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy in Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: A Meta-analysis].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Advanced Bronchoscopic Approaches to Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: a Narrative Review of Current and Emerging Techniques.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Review
- Diagnostic utility of bronchoscopy for newly emerging peripheral pulmonary lesions after pulmonary resection.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- The effect of combining different sampling tools on the performance of electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy for the evaluation of peripheral lung lesions and factors associated with its diagnostic yield.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Diagnostic Performance of Electromagnetic Navigation versus Virtual Navigation Bronchoscopy-Guided Biopsy for Pulmonary Lesions in a Single Institution: Potential Role of Artificial Intelligence for Navigation Planning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Computed Tomography Bronchus Sign Subclassification during Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Biopsy: A Retrospective Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- V7 ENB-guided thoracoscopic sublobectomy for stage IA synchronous multiple primary lung cancer.Thoracic cancer · 2022Article
- Expert consensus on indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for thoracoscopic lung resection (The Version 2022).Translational lung cancer research · 2022Review
- Evaluation of the synergistic impact of needle and forceps biopsy with electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy: the CONFIDENT-ENB trial design.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) is an emerging technique for diagnosing pulmonary lesions. However, limited data is available on its sole utility under a least invasive setting without general anesthesia. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and safety of sole ENB under moderate sedation for diagnosing pulmonary lesions suspicious for lung cancer and to determine clinical factors associated with a better diagnostic yield. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent sole ENB under moderate sedation for lung lesion biopsy between August 2016 and June 2021 at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, a tertiary center in South Korea. Diagnostic yield of the ENB-guided biopsy, safety endpoints defined by the incidence and severity of associated complications, and factors associated with higher diagnostic yield were evaluated. Results: A total of 94 patients were evaluated. The final diagnostic yield of ENB was 81.5% (75/92), excluding two indeterminate cases. The diagnostic yield ranged from 79.8% to 81.9% assuming all indeterminate cases were false-negatives (79.8%) and true-negatives (81.9%). The sensitivity and specificity for malignancy were 77.6% (ranging from 75.6% to 77.6%) and 100%, respectively. Any-grade pneumothorax occurred in 4.3% of the patients, and 2.1% developed pneumothorax requiring additional intervention. Multivariable analyses identified the presence of a class 2 bronchus sign as the only significant predictor for a higher diagnostic yield (odds ratio =4.83, 95% CI: 1.16-20.12). The diagnostic yield of ENB among those with class 2 bronchus sign was 89.8% (53/59). Conclusions: Sole ENB under moderate sedation for diagnosing pulmonary lesions displayed a good diagnostic yield and safety profile, thus confirming its utility in a least-invasive setting. Moreover, sole ENB could be possibly be superior to transthoracic needle aspiration for diagnosing lesions with class 2 bronchus sign accounting for similar yields and lower complication rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.