ArticleAdvanced nanobiomed research2021
Morphological Factors that Underlie Neural Sensitivity to Stimulation in the Retina.
Article in Advanced nanobiomed research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transparent and Conformal Microcoil Arrays for Spatially Selective Neuronal Activation.Device · 2024Article
- Modeling extracellular stimulation of retinal ganglion cells: theoretical and practical aspects.Journal of neural engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Retinal prostheses are a promising therapeutic intervention for patients afflicted by outer retinal degenerative diseases like retinitis pigmentosa and age-related macular degeneration. While significant advances in the development of retinal implants have been made, the quality of vision elicited by these devices remains largely sub-optimal. The variability in the responses produced by retinal devices is most likely due to the differences between the natural cell type-specific signaling that occur in the healthy retina vs. the non-specific activation of multiple cell types arising from artificial stimulation. In order to replicate these natural signaling patterns, stimulation strategies must be capable of preferentially activating specific RGC types. To design more selective stimulation strategies, a better understanding of the morphological factors that underlie the sensitivity to prosthetic stimulation must be developed. This review will focus on the role that different anatomical components play in driving the direct activation of RGCs by extracellular stimulation. Briefly, it will (1) characterize the variability in morphological properties of α-RGCs, (2) detail the influence of morphology on the direct activation of RGCs by electric stimulation, and (3) describe some of the potential biophysical mechanisms that could explain differences in activation thresholds and electrically evoked responses between RGC types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.