ArticleCureus2022
The Outcome of Status Epilepticus Among Adults in Aseer Region of Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Frequency and clinico-therapeutic features of patients with status epilecticus hospitalized in the department of neurology of the Bafelatanana hospital, Antananarivo, Madagascar].The Pan African medical journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Epileptic seizure episodes can vary from brief and nearly undetectable to long periods of vigorous shaking. These episodes can result in physical injuries, occasionally including broken bones. With epilepsy, seizures tend to recur and, as a rule, have no immediate underlying cause. Status epilepticus (SE) is an attack of a seizure lasting for more than five minutes or two or more seizures without the person returning to normal between the attacks. Previous definitions used a 30-minute time limit. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcome of SE among adult patients in the Aseer region. Materials and methods A retrospective record-based cohort study design was conducted, targeting all accessible medical files of adult patients with SE who were admitted to the Aseer central hospital and military hospital from 2010 to 2017. Data were extracted from all complete and accessible files. Records with missing data were excluded. Clinical outcomes for the cases included were assessed and categorized into cases of complete recovery (without sequelae), cases with incomplete recovery, and death. Results The study included 19 adult patients with SE whose ages ranged from seven to 87 years with a mean age of 33.4 ± 22.5 years. Men made up 63.2% of the cases. Infection was the most recorded risk factor among the cases, followed by anti-epileptic drug withdrawal. Only two cases recovered with sequelae, while the remaining 17 cases recovered completely. There were no deaths. Conclusions The study revealed that nearly all cases recovered completely with no complications, particularly men who immediately received IV treatment. Early diagnosis and receiving treatment under careful observation via follow-up are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.