ArticleFrontiers in physiology2022
Role of Scar and Border Zone Geometry on the Genesis and Maintenance of Re-Entrant Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Previous Myocardial Infarction.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- An eikonal model with re-excitability for fast simulations in cardiac electrophysiology.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Prediction of arrhythmogenesis in non-ischemic cardiac resynchronization therapy patients.APL bioengineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In patients with healed myocardial infarction, the left ventricular ejection fraction is characterized by low sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of future malignant arrhythmias. Thus, there is the need for new parameters in daily practice to perform arrhythmic risk stratification. The aim of this study is to identify some features of proarrhythmic geometric configurations of scars and border zones (BZ), by means of numerical simulations based on left ventricular models derived from post myocardial infarction patients. Two patients with similar clinical characteristics were included in this study. Both patients exhibited left ventricular scars characterized by subendo- and subepicardial BZ and a transmural BZ isthmus. The scar of patient #1 was significantly larger than that of patient #2, whereas the transmural BZ isthmus and the subdendo- and subepicardial BZs of patient #2 were thicker than those of patient #1. Patient #1 was positive at electrophysiologic testing, whereas patient #2 was negative. Based on the cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) data, we developed a geometric model of the left ventricles of the two patients, taking into account the position, extent, and topological features of scars and BZ. The numerical simulations were based on the anisotropic monodomain model of electrocardiology. In the model of patient #1, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) was inducible by an S2 stimulus delivered at any of the six stimulation sites considered, while in the model of patient #2 we were not able to induce sustained VT. In the model of patient #1, making the subendo- and subepicardial BZs as thick as those of patient #2 did not affect the inducibility and maintenance of VT. On the other hand, in the model of patient #2, making the subendo- and subepicardial BZs as thin as those of patient #1 yielded sustained VT. In conclusion, the results show that the numerical simulations have an effective predictive capability in discriminating patients at high arrhythmic risk. The extent of the infarct scar and the presence of transmural BZ isthmuses and thin subendo- and subepicardial BZs promote sustained VT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.