ReviewHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2022
A report of a South African university's management of undergraduate nursing students' teaching and learning following the COVID-19 interruptions.
Review in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the perspectives of undergraduate allied health sciences, dentistry and nursing students regarding the unpaid clinical placements.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Undergraduate nursing students' post-coronavirus disease 2019 academic learning experiences at a public university in South Africa: A qualitative study.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2025Article
- Reflections on a nursing education institution transitioning to online education during the Covid-19 pandemic.International journal of Africa nursing sciences · 2023Article
- Blended learning during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic: Attitudes of nurse educators in Gauteng.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic exposed an absence of blueprints to avert an education disaster. In South Africa, in line with Alert Level-5, adhering to lockdown restrictions, higher education institutions (HEIs) closed, necessitating the transition to online teaching and learning. The HEIs, inclusive of the nursing discipline, needed to develop comprehensive plans and a rigorous follow-up scheme in order to ensure that faculty and students made proper use of virtual platforms and simultaneously met regulatory body requirements, thus ensuring that 'no student and faculty were left behind'. The responses varied from one HEI to another. The objective of this study was to present how a South African nursing education faculty managed teaching and learning following COVID-19-related interruptions. This included an HEI in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Donabedian's tripartite model, comprising structure, process and outcome, provides the organising structure to present the faculty and university's approach to meet the desired outcome of saving the 2020 academic year. The Structures' and Processes' components of Donabedian's tripartite model influenced both intended and unintended outcomes. In 3 months, what might have been argued as impossible, a 4-year undergraduate nursing programme was transitioned from a traditional approach to fully virtual remote teaching and learning. Thus, the 2020 academic year was saved. Contribution: This article offers guidance to HEIs on how to continue teaching and learning in contexts where education is interrupted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.