Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35399185›Full record

ArticleNAR cancer2022

Multi-omics data integration analysis identifies the spliceosome as a key regulator of DNA double-strand break repair.

Dana Sherill-Rofe, Oded Raban, Steven Findlay, Dolev Rahat, Irene Unterman, Arash Samiei, Amber Yasmeen, Zafir Kaiser, Hellen Kuasne, Morag Park and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Antiaging Effect of 2-Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dana Sherill-RofeDepartment of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, Hebrew University of Jerusalem-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Oded RabanLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.
Steven FindlayLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.
Dolev RahatDepartment of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, Hebrew University of Jerusalem-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Irene UntermanDepartment of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, Hebrew University of Jerusalem-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Arash SamieiLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.
Amber YasmeenLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.
Zafir KaiserDepartment of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1Y6, Canada.
Hellen KuasneDepartment of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1Y6, Canada.
Morag ParkDepartment of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1Y6, Canada.
William D FoulkesThe Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
Idit BlochDepartment of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, Hebrew University of Jerusalem-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Aviad ZickDepartment of Oncology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5077-9249
Walter H GotliebDivision of Gynecology Oncology, Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.
Yuval TabachDepartment of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, Hebrew University of Jerusalem-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9521-3217
Alexandre OrthweinLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7350-3413
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILJewish General Hospital · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA repair by homologous recombination (HR) is critical for the maintenance of genome stability. Germline and somatic mutations in HR genes have been associated with an increased risk of developing breast (BC) and ovarian cancers (OvC). However, the extent of factors and pathways that are functionally linked to HR with clinical relevance for BC and OvC remains unclear. To gain a broader understanding of this pathway, we used multi-omics datasets coupled with machine learning to identify genes that are associated with HR and to predict their sub-function. Specifically, we integrated our phylogenetic-based co-evolution approach (CladePP) with 23 distinct genetic and proteomic screens that monitored, directly or indirectly, DNA repair by HR. This omics data integration analysis yielded a new database (HRbase) that contains a list of 464 predictions, including 76 gold standard HR genes. Interestingly, the spliceosome machinery emerged as one major pathway with significant cross-platform interactions with the HR pathway. We functionally validated 6 spliceosome factors, including the RNA helicase SNRNP200 and its co-factor SNW1. Importantly, their RNA expression correlated with BC/OvC patient outcome. Altogether, we identified novel clinically relevant DNA repair factors and delineated their specific sub-function by machine learning. Our results, supported by evolutionary and multi-omics analyses, suggest that the spliceosome machinery plays an important role during the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs).

Identifiers

PMID35399185
PMCPMC8991968
OpenAlexW4223451651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.