Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35399125›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2022

The current standing of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

A G Willison, T Ruck, G Lenz, H P Hartung, S G Meuth

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

A G WillisonDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany. alicegrizzel.willison@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0719-8334
T RuckDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
G LenzDepartment of Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, Germany.
H P HartungDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany. hans-peter.hartung@uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0614-6989
S G MeuthDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is gaining traction as a valuable treatment option for patients affected by severe multiple sclerosis (MS), particularly the relapsing-remitting form. We describe the current literature in terms of clinical trials, observational and retrospective studies, as well as immune reconstitution following transplantation, with a focus on the conditioning regimens used for transplantation. The evidence base predominantly consists of non-randomised, uncontrolled clinical trials or data from retrospective or observational cohorts, i.e. very few randomised or controlled trials. Most often, intermediate-intensity conditioning regimens are used, with promising results from both myeloablative and lymphoablative strategies, as well as from regimens that are low and high intensity. Efficacy of transplantation, which is likely secondary to immune reconstitution and restored immune tolerance, is, therefore, not clearly dependent on the intensity of the conditioning regimen. However, the conditioning regimen may well influence the immune response to transplantation. Heterogeneity of conditioning regimens among studies hinders synthesis of the articles assessing post-aHSCT immune system changes. Factors associated with better outcomes were lower Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale, relapsing-remitting MS, younger age, and shorter disease duration at baseline, which supports the guidance for patient selection proposed by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Interestingly, promising outcomes were described for patients with secondary progressive MS by some studies, which may be worth taking into account when considering treatment options for patients with active, progressive disease. Of note, a significant proportion of patients develop autoimmune disease following transplantation, with alemtuzumab-containing regimens associated with the highest incidence.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMultiple SclerosisHumansRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, AutologousTreatment OutcomeAutologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantImmune reconstitutionMultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID35399125
PMCPMC8995166
OpenAlexW4223446263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.