ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2022
Donor age and body weight determine the effects of fecal microbiota transplantation on growth performance, and fecal microbiota development in recipient pigs.
Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of bovine respiratory disease on the respiratory microbiome: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Pooled it
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Improves Biota and Hepatic Metabolism, Promoting Growth in SD Rats Under Hypobaric Hypoxia Exposure.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Impact of a single fecal microbiome transplantation in adult women with anorexia nervosa: an open-label feasibility pilot trial.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Route of fecal microbiota transplantation delivery determined the dynamics and predictability of donor microbe colonization.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Active Factors in the Adult Pig Colon: Microbial Transplantation Versus Supplementation with Metabolites in Weaned Piglets.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Fecal microbiota transplantation in pigs: current status and future perspective.Animal microbiome · 2025Review
- Fecal microbiota transplantation modulates jejunal host-microbiota interface in weanling piglets.Microbiome · 2025Article
- Transplantation of fecal microbiota from different breeds improved intestinal barrier condition and modulated ileal microflora of recipient pigs.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
- Characterization of the fecal microbiota of Pampa Rocha pigs, a genetic resource endemic to eastern Uruguay.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Transplantation of fecal filtrate to neonatal pigs reduces post-weaning diarrhea: A pilot study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Uncovering the biogeography of the microbial commmunity and its association with nutrient metabolism in the intestinal tract using a pig model.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe application of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) to improve swine growth performance has been sporadically studied. Most of these studies used a single microbiota source and thus the effect of donor characteristics on recipient pigs' fecal microbiota development and growth performance is largely unknown.
resultsIn this study, we collected feces from six donors with heavy (H) or light (L) body weight and different ages (d 42, nursery; d 96, growing; and d 170, finisher) to evaluate their effects on the growth performance and fecal microbiota development of recipient pigs. Generally, recipients that received two doses of FMT from nursery and finisher stages donor at weaning (21 ± 2 days of age) inherited the donor's growth pattern, while the pigs gavaged with grower stage material exerted a numerically greater weight gain than the control pigs regardless of donor BW. FMT from heavier donors (NH, GH, and FH) led to the recipients to have numerically increased growth compared to their lighter counterparts (NL, GL, and FL, respectively) throughout the growing and most finishing stages. This benefit could be attributed to the enrichment of ASV25 Faecalibacterium, ASV61 Faecalibacterium, ASV438 Coriobacteriaceae_unclassified, ASV144 Bulleidia, and ASV129 Oribacterium and decrease of ASV13 Escherichia during nursery stage. Fecal microbiota transplantation from growing and finishing donors influenced the microbial community significantly in recipient pigs during the nursery stage. FMT of older donors' gut microbiota expedited recipients' microbiota maturity on d 35 and 49, indicated by increased estimated microbiota ages. The age-associated bacterial taxa included ASV206 Ruminococcaceae, ASV211 Butyrivibrio, ASV416 Bacteroides, ASV2 Streptococcus, and ASV291 Veillonellaceae. The body weight differences between GL and GH pigs on d 104 were associated with the increased synthesis of the essential amino acid, lysine and methionine, mixed acid fermentation, expedited glycolysis, and sucrose/galactose degradation.
conclusionsOverall, our study provided insights into how donor age and body weight affect FMT outcomes regarding growth performance, microbiota community shifts, and lower GI tract metabolic potentials. This study also provided guidance to select qualified donors for future fecal microbiota transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.