Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35399066›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Giving birth in a pandemic: women's birth experiences in England during COVID-19.

Ezra Aydin, Kevin A Glasgow, Staci M Weiss, Zahra Khan, Topun Austin, Mark H Johnson, Jane Barlow, Sarah Lloyd-Fox

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Predictors of Postpartum Depression among Italian Women: A Longitudinal Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ezra AydinDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK. ea420@cam.ac.uk.
Kevin A GlasgowDepartment of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Staci M WeissDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Zahra KhanDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Topun AustinNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Mark H JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Jane Barlow *Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sarah Lloyd-Fox *Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBBirkbeck, University of London · GBNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S018425/1Medical Research Council MR/T003057/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpectant parents worldwide have experienced changes in the way they give birth as a result of COVID-19, including restrictions relating to access to birthing units and the presence of birthing partners during the birth, and changes to birth plans. This paper reports the experiences of women in England.

methodsData were obtained from both closed- and open-ended responses collected as part of the national COVID in Context of Pregnancy, Infancy and Parenting (CoCoPIP) Study online survey (n = 477 families) between 15th July 2020 - 29th March 2021. Frequency data are presented alongside the results of a sentiment analysis; the open-ended data was analysed thematically.

resultsTwo-thirds of expectant women reported giving birth via spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) (66.1%) and a third via caesarean section (CS) (32.6%) or 'other' (1.3%). Just under half (49.7%) of the CS were reported to have been elective/planned, with 47.7% being emergencies. A third (37.4%) of participants reported having no changes to their birth (as set out in their birthing plan), with a further 25% reporting COVID-related changes, and 37.4% reporting non-COVID related changes (e.g., changes as a result of birthing complications). One quarter of the sample reported COVID-related changes to their birth plan, including limited birthing options and reduced feelings of control; difficulties accessing pain-relief and assistance, and feelings of distress and anxiety. Under half of the respondents reported not knowing whether there could be someone present at the birth (44.8%), with 2.3% of respondents reporting no birthing partner being present due to COVID-related restrictions. Parental experiences of communication and advice provided by the hospital prior to delivery were mixed, with significant stress and anxiety being reported in relation to both the fluctuating guidance and lack of certainty regarding the presence of birthing partners at the birth. The sentiment analysis revealed that participant experiences of giving birth during the pandemic were predominately negative (46.9%) particularly in relation to the first national lockdown, with a smaller proportion of positive (33.2%) and neutral responses (19.9%).

conclusionThe proportion of parents reporting birthing interventions (i.e., emergency CS) was higher than previously reported, as were uncertainties related to the birth, and poor communication, leading to increased feelings of anxiety and high levels of negative emotions. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionCOVID-19Communicable Disease ControlEnglandFemaleHumansPandemicsParturitionPregnancyBirth experienceCOVID-19EnglandPregnancyThematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID35399066
PMCPMC8994823
OpenAlexW4226109850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.