Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35399013›Full record

ArticleGenomics & informatics2022

MPI-GWAS: a supercomputing-aided permutation approach for genomewide association studies.

Hyojung Paik, Yongseong Cho, Seong Beom Cho, Oh-Kyoung Kwon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics & informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hyojung PaikDivision of Supercomputing, Center for supercomputing application and research, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI), Daejeon 34141, Korea.
Yongseong ChoDivision of Supercomputing, Center for supercomputing application and research, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI), Daejeon 34141, Korea.
Seong Beom ChoDepartment of Bio-Medical Informatics, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon 21565, Korea.
Oh-Kyoung KwonDivision of Supercomputing, Center for supercomputing application and research, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI), Daejeon 34141, Korea.

Funding

Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information K-21-L02-C10, K-20-L02-C10-S01, K-21-L02-C10-S01Ministry of Science and ICT N-21-NM-CA08-S01National Research Foundation of Korea 2021M3H9A203052011National Supercomputing Center with supercomputing resources including technical support TS-2021-RG-0006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Permutation testing is a robust and popular approach for significance testing in genomic research that has the advantage of reducing inflated type 1 error rates; however, its computational cost is notorious in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Here, we developed a supercomputing-aided approach to accelerate the permutation testing for GWAS, based on the message-passing interface (MPI) on parallel computing architecture. Our application, called MPI-GWAS, conducts MPI-based permutation testing using a parallel computing approach with our supercomputing system, Nurion (8,305 compute nodes, and 563,740 central processing units [CPUs]). For 107 permutations of one locus in MPI-GWAS, it was calculated in 600 s using 2,720 CPU cores. For 107 permutations of ~30,000-50,000 loci in over 7,000 subjects, the total elapsed time was ~4 days in the Nurion supercomputer. Thus, MPI-GWAS enables us to feasibly compute the permutation-based GWAS within a reason-able time by harnessing the power of parallel computing resources.

Indexed as

genome-wide association studymessage-passing interfaceparallel computingsupercomputing

Identifiers

PMID35399013
PMCPMC9001997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.